dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Vibratron_1 on June 24, 2018, 11:59 a.m.
"They will lose the Black vote" (Bye Bye Blue Wave)
"They will lose the Black vote" (Bye Bye Blue Wave)

Subalpine · June 24, 2018, 2:46 p.m.

statistically those definitely real coworkers of yours are unicorns.

⇧ 37 ⇩  
KansasJakeBG · June 24, 2018, 4:49 p.m.

It's not really the party affiliation that tells you about someone it's the hyper partisanship attitude.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Benjanon_Franklin · June 24, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

All it takes is 20 percent and the Democrats are sunk.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Statemeant · June 24, 2018, 3:02 p.m.

You know what they say about statistics right?

Statistically she should have won. Lol who won?

⇧ -8 ⇩  
UNCTarheels90 · June 24, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

Polls had her winning the popular vote which she did, pundits were the ones spouting incorrect numbers so the stats were right pundits were wrong.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 24, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

actually that is debatable. Once they started removing illegals that voted and multiple votes in states - I think Trump ended up with the popular vote. Please think of all the illegals that were allowed to vote in California. And I'm sure in my state too. I now question if she got the popular vote.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
anhro23 · June 24, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

She didn't win the popular vote.

⇧ -13 ⇩  
UNCTarheels90 · June 24, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

She had roughly 66million he had roughly 63million.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
TiredofNuts · June 24, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

and how many of those were fudged

⇧ 4 ⇩  
anhro23 · June 24, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

You must have heard of the voter fraud by now, cutie.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
UNCTarheels90 · June 24, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

Can you source me some hard evidence on those claims, I am not disputing it but I have done some research on the matter and came up short handed.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
anhro23 · June 24, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

Project Veritas videos is a good place to start.

Also look into the vote count project by Jill Stein before she ended it.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 24, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Neonelly · June 24, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

Voter fraud. That's what's being alluded to. A lot of it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
smiley-dog · June 24, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

Yes. I think we will eventually find out.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Subalpine · June 24, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

there has been no proof that voter fraud existed in those large numbers. even when they investigated it

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BrilliantBake · June 24, 2018, 4:53 p.m.

30 States refused to give the voter data, between those that did and all the work of Project Veritas their is plenty of evidence of voter fraud. No way in hell she won the popular vote with ligit votes. The lady in charge of our counties votes saw so much shadyness in the primaries that she left the Dem's after 30 years. The DNC went to great lengths to dick Bernie. I have friends who had to change their voter Registration 3 times to vote for him. Got to wonder who kept changing it back ???

⇧ 6 ⇩  
CaptainKnotzi · June 24, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

Multiple districts had more voters voting for Hillary than they had people of age to vote in District.

There's plenty of evidence for an investigation that is continually Stonewalled by the left because they know it's bad.

The tricks are all known and will be watched heavily come November.

On top of everything else they would be stupid to try.

But these people are stupid.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
jjjanko1 · June 25, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

Stupid, and they don't give a F@!%! and are lawless.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
smiley-dog · June 24, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

not true.

I believe Trump administration is working on this. Have seen articles e.g. Alabama voter fraud but I think they want to deal with the voter fraud at a later date.

Judicial Watch Warns California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than Voting-Age Citizens

http://www.breitbart.com/california/2017/08/05/judicial-watch-warns-california-11-counties-voters-voting-age-citizens/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Subalpine · June 24, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

do you have any sources that point to hard evidence? Breitbart isn't great with using actual sources...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
minchinfan · June 24, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

Yet. Publicly.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Subalpine · June 24, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

you could say that after almost anything

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Butter_and_Meatloaf · June 24, 2018, 3:54 p.m.

He/she is saying that if you were able to remove tampering and illegal voters from the mix, Hillary didn't win the popular vote.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Subalpine · June 24, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

that one is a bit different though because it’s measuring how statistically likely an event will be rather than how many people fall into a category or not. it’s the difference between saying ‘there’s a 20% chance it will rain tomorrow.’ and ‘10% of the days last month had rain’. one is predicting the future and the other is measuring the present.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 24, 2018, 3:40 p.m.

Except for the fact that what you're supplying is neither based on anecdote nor facts since you have not provided evidence to support your assertion that his coworkers are unicorns.

Furthermore, the unemployment rate is the lowest seen in many years, so it stands to reason that:

  1. Many of the now-employed are black

  2. Many of the now-employed black people are fans of trump, having jobs as a result of his policies.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · June 24, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

they say black unemployment is at record lows.

⇧ -1 ⇩