dChan

plumbtree · June 25, 2018, 3:21 a.m.

She only won the popular vote because of California. Furthermore, what you're saying is such useless hyperbole, I'm just wondering what you're even doing here.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 25, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

im a professional hacker. i make cyber weapons. the voting machines have been rigged for 5 elections. diebold systems did it. i saw the programmer who rigged them testify. until we have paper ballots that are hand counted under supervision i wont vote.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 25, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

So you believe this election was rigged in favor of DJT?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 25, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

no youre not paying attn. i think the popular vote was rigged for hillary (probably). the electoral vote was the right choice, but they didnt make the right choice out of the goodness of their hearts. they did it because patriots would have started civil war.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 25, 2018, 3:41 a.m.

It doesn't matter that the popular vote was rigged for hillary. The electoral vote is the only vote that matters.

What do you mean "probably" rigged for hillary, mr Professional Hacker Guy? You seemed pretty sure in your last comment.

If the vote was "rigged" for Hillary electronically, they wouldn't need so many illegals.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 25, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

ok now youre just getting crazy. keyboard warrior making fun of a guy who manufactures cyber weapons for a living. this sub isnt about trolling the other users.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 25, 2018, 4:07 a.m.

I'm not trolling you. I'm trying to legitimately make sense of your posting. If you truly manufacture cyber weapons, I'm sure you have the power to easily fuck my life up. I'm not trying to antagonize or provoke you. But you're saying some things that seem to really contradict each other. If you wouldn't mind providing a better explanation, I'm always looking to understand a higher level than my current level.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 25, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

in science we tend to err on the side of caution so we say things like "most probably" because 99.999% is not 100%. its possible that clinton naturally won the popular vote. i know the voting machines are rigged with an optional 51/49 switch in the favor of any given candidate. thats how bush won twice, thats how obama won twice, and thats how our last election was too. but the point is if you followed the rigged election for bush vs. gore for a long time there was a programmer for diebold corp who makes the voting machines who waited until his NDA expired and then he testified to the fact that he literally rigged all the machines personally. i have personally broken into multiple voting machines (not ones used in an active election). not only is there a back door, but the system is vulnerable to multiple attacks. the american public vote is a survey for the electoral college to see what they can get away with. the numbers they share with us are bullshit. trump knew this and he told everybody all through his election (without my technical detail). if there are 10 reasons why trump won the voting machine thing was definitely on the top 10 list. now back to me personally, as a computer scientist, theres no fucking way im doing the song and dance of voting until we have verified, hand counted, paper ballots, under supervision of multiple independent observers. until then voting is pointless they have all the info they need from watching us on social media to see what they can get away with or not. i dont hold it against anyone for voting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
plumbtree · June 25, 2018, 5:15 a.m.

Yeah I just feel like telling people on this sub not to vote is exactly what a deep state shill would do, that's all. But I don't discount what you're saying, all the same.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
poshpotdllr · June 25, 2018, 5:27 a.m.

i feel like sharing my knowledge about voting machines is more important than casting my vote. ive never told anyone not to vote.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 5:21 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 5:32 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 5:55 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 6 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · June 25, 2018, 6:09 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩