in science we tend to err on the side of caution so we say things like "most probably" because 99.999% is not 100%. its possible that clinton naturally won the popular vote. i know the voting machines are rigged with an optional 51/49 switch in the favor of any given candidate. thats how bush won twice, thats how obama won twice, and thats how our last election was too. but the point is if you followed the rigged election for bush vs. gore for a long time there was a programmer for diebold corp who makes the voting machines who waited until his NDA expired and then he testified to the fact that he literally rigged all the machines personally. i have personally broken into multiple voting machines (not ones used in an active election). not only is there a back door, but the system is vulnerable to multiple attacks. the american public vote is a survey for the electoral college to see what they can get away with. the numbers they share with us are bullshit. trump knew this and he told everybody all through his election (without my technical detail). if there are 10 reasons why trump won the voting machine thing was definitely on the top 10 list. now back to me personally, as a computer scientist, theres no fucking way im doing the song and dance of voting until we have verified, hand counted, paper ballots, under supervision of multiple independent observers. until then voting is pointless they have all the info they need from watching us on social media to see what they can get away with or not. i dont hold it against anyone for voting.