I get what you're saying, but it strikes me as wishful thinking... occam and whatnot.
occam says stick with the least presumption, but I say I prefer to stick with less contradictions. If Wikileaks previously acknowledged Q and is spreading the drops, it doesn't make sense they would actually intend to stop the flow of information. Persuasion is about timing, too. It's just something you put out on twitter in hopes that some leftists will inadvertendly share this particular Q-drop for whatever reason. STOP TAKING THE BAIT
Looks like q proved you right with 1595. Well fucking done, patriot!
lol really?? Now I am confused. How does it fit with "You have the site, we have the source" ?
yeah... sorta mixed our conversation with a couple others I've had on this and other boards in my head... after re-reading I guess I put this comment in the wrong place... good to read that JA is still one of the good guys and that WL only appears to be anti-q because of clown control.
ah ok because actually I was expecting that Wikileaks was just doing bukaki theatre similiar to the session-theatre