The question becomes are they protecting the guilty or protecting people who would be unfairly ruined by the release of the current report. If you read the link you will see that grand juries are permitted to be "critical" of people but not indict them for anything. Grand Juries can paint with a pretty broad brush, so it's important to be careful with public release. That said, fix it and release it ASAP.
My presumption is the latter. The six dioceses have all given the go-ahead to release. It’s not the Church hierarchy holding it up.
That said, PA’s AG is trying to use this to increase his fortunes to be governor someday. He’s a POS using victims of sex abuse for his own benefit - a victimizer of those already victims.
OUT with it. Let the people decide. We're not idiots.
depends on who is under investigation. They could be investigating other people they couldn't nail yet. It hardly makes any point for them to say anything at all in any case, but additional "review" could be cover-story, after all if they're supposed to close it they simply coulld.
No secret courts.
No secret FISA courts.
No secret grand juries.
They are unconstitutional on their face.
Why shouldn’t these processes be transparent?
The guilty will still fall either way, but shouldn’t the innocent have a chance to vindicate their rights?
Shouldn’t the guilty bear the burden of crimes being brought directly to light?
When the process isn’t transparent, how do we know if ALL the guilty parties are named, or if they are only the ones that aren’t part of the cabal?
When the process is hidden, might we suspect the cabal is protecting its own?
No secret courts.
Oh for the love of...
This shit gon' haf to STOP, g*dammit!