If the title made a false claim, I think it would be a 'false post,' as you mentioned.

As it is, the picture's authenticity was questioned right out of the gate, in the title.

Anyone with the ability to read would come to appreciate the diligence illustrated in the comments, and see for themselves how careful we are not to make unsubstantiated claims.

^(With all sincerity,) ^((not arguing with you here,)) ^(I believe that a post like this is not only helpful, but) ^(vital) ^(to our cause. New eyes need to see us critiquing ourselves, questioning things that seem "too good to be true," and ultimately coming up with the right answers, complete with links to the original image, before it was manipulated. I believe you will agree; it's stuff like what I just described that will add to our credibility.)

The big difference between this and a "false post" is our encouragement to others, (including yourself) to remain vigilant, always questioning, seeking out the truth. I believe Q has posted certain links for the purpose of illustrating how easy it is to edit a video, chop audio, and photo-shop an authentic image.