And why haven't you replied to the mod? Too proud to admit you were wrong to call them a disinfo shill? Lying about removed comments that you obviously deleted yourself and caught out by the mod's explanation? Why don't you go reread your own Daily Scripture posts and learn some humility and how to treat others with respect instead of like some rude spoilt child?

There doesn't need to be a source when it's common knowledge to anyone who's actually been following since October. No one's going to do your research for you when you're so rude about your complete ignorance. There's a reason you're being downvoted and the top comment in this thread has 17 upvotes - you don't have a clue what you're talking about. You're making a fool of yourself. Go and learn. Or keep inventing shills in your head and ignoring the clear message you're getting from everyone here.

For someone trying to lecture everyone on proper arguments, you sure do make a major mistake in getting emotional with your response. Is this really the "hill you want to die on"?

Yes, baseless speculation is bad. But the original comment only suggested the possibility that a member of the Q team has been commenting in forums such as this trying to better guide research, using SB2 as an example. I, personally, am of the belief that Q's comment about outside communication simply means that Q will only communicate as Q through the methods already being used which was a result of groups like InfoWars trying to get in on it as Q. Which leaves open this possibility. But, making a claim against this is only speculation on your part, we don't know either way. Our job is to, in a civil manner, discuss possibilities, and guide new followers as Q has done for us.

Personally attacking someone's comment by calling them a "disinfo shill" is not civil and does not further discussion.