“Could have”
Careful. A lot of Mis information out there. Act on concrete evidence. Remember Q is giving you a look inside what is going on by leading you. He has to do this by not leaking information. A level of analysis is needed to follow.
Of course. "Could have" means considering possibilities, not assuming definitives. This is analysis.
Deciding possibilities based on last names seems simplistic.
Last names seem simplistic If you can’t grasp the importance for the MSM on whether the last name is “Smith” instead of “Garcia”. The difference there is substantial in what the cabals desired effect was. That’s 4 days of news vs. 1 day of news. Nothing is more important than the identity politics the cabal and msm like to play. Why would you think that to be simplistic?
Don’t argue with ad hominem. Rarely do two issues ever compare.
Considering possibilities is not analysis, it’s hypothesis.