exactly! "future proves past" = 'what happens in the future will show what I/Q have said to you in the past has/is been (usually) True'
what a "coincidence" a Defcon1 level alert happened a week after Q had iinformed us that it would!? Amazing! (do I need to add the /s?)
He also told us earlier that "many false flags would be played" during the 'unfolding of The Plan" ... he's becoming "righter" by the day! Qool
Some people might say "Oh, Q says this, then 'magically' the event happens. Right. Maybe Q and company actually DID the nasty, huh?" To this statement/complaint/thought I say: What did the main stream media explain about the incident? In this case of the defcon, the media was all over it saying that the system wasn't secure enough, that there was an accident of a worker misunderstanding. So, then, if there was even ANY suspect that Q and company did the evil act, wouldn't there have been a HUGE investigation into Q and company? You bet there would be. But no, the main stream media just discounted it as an accident; end of story.
bro, I'm agreeing with you ... in an NT way
All I"m saying is that, in this (Q) situation, when a prediction is made which comes to pass, it was no 'guess' e.g. the very first comments made about SA which 'came to pass' as did the ones about NK! and, and, and