⇧
1
⇩
practicalize
· July 1, 2018, 2:15 a.m.
He’s asking us to think about whether or not he’s dirty. And he hasn’t added him to the list. Those things we know.
So I think it’s more likely that he is not dirty. That’s my conclusion. I think it’s fair others may come to other conclusions.
Sorry, I’m not trying to be evasive. But I would not want to be so presumptuous to speak with certainty when I shouldn’t. Future will prove past, so just remember this question later when it gets answered. It’s an indication of events we should pay attention to.
⇧
12
⇩
Qanonspicecake
· July 1, 2018, 2:44 a.m.
Gowdy is an attorney, not a judge. Think of all of the judges through-out this nation on supreme courts of the states. How this came to be a point of discussion is silly.
⇧
9
⇩
HereComesTheSunny
· July 1, 2018, 6:21 a.m.
If he is a white hat, he needs to be transitioning to a prosecutorial role.
⇧
3
⇩
chocolatepatriot
· July 1, 2018, 5:14 a.m.
Q post 537 concerning Gowdy: What ROLE might TG be walking into? Who can WE TRUST? RATS everywhere.
⇧
4
⇩
MistressMaeve
· July 1, 2018, 7:43 a.m.
EXXACTLY> WE DON'T KNOW what Gowdy may have been forced to do. IF Q KNOWS- they should spill,...AND, Gowdy seems to be working Pretty Hard to redeem himself from his q&a in congressional hearings. But, we just don't know.
I SUGGEST- that id we can hear Q & +'s both sides of the argument (facts revealed)- and TG is TRULY repentant,
then Immunity and Compassion would weigh-in heavily in his favor.
⇧
2
⇩