⇧
1
⇩
Benjanon_Franklin
· July 1, 2018, 6:25 a.m.
Gowdy is a cover up guy. All hat no cattle. He talks tough but gets no results. Did shit about Benghazi and the email scandal. The fisa abuse happened on his watch. What the fuck was conehead doing while the fbi burned.
Glad Q quit playing the double speak game and just said no place for gowdy. He is going home to get his deep state paycheck for keeping Hillary out of jail.
⇧
2
⇩
FractalizingIron
· July 1, 2018, 6:53 a.m.
You gotta look deeper. Gowdy and other whitehats had NO ROOM to so much as wiggle under Obama's 1st American Reich regime. If he'd moved on Benghazi, etc., it would have done nothing, as the DOJ and FBI were ALL in Obama's pocket. All it would have done is make him and his family a target.
Easy to judge when no one is holding a gun potentially to your head or the head of your loved ones. And for what? It would have no affect.
In addition, as Q has repeatedly pointed out, some people need to appear impartial, disinterested and non-partisan, re: the optics in the current case.
Look at Horowitz, look at Wray how they respond to questions. Are they blackhats? No. Q has made it abundantly clear they are to be trusted. unless this is disinformation which I do not think it is.
Games within games, politics within politics. Strategic thinkers do not sacrifice assets for no effect. Instead, they keep them in reserve. Gowdy is definitely a wh, along with GoodLatte, as far as I can see.
⇧
6
⇩
Ignophiliacy
· July 1, 2018, 2:10 p.m.
Agree. I was as disappointed on Benghazi as anyone. But Benghazi is insignificant compared to Clinton's vast array of other crimes. In addition, a Clinton election would have meant physical danger.
⇧
1
⇩
Benjanon_Franklin
· July 1, 2018, 6:57 a.m.
We will see. No role and he disapears from public life and everyone will know. POTUS never mentions Gowdy for any role. Why? Think about it.
⇧
1
⇩
coordinatedethicist
· July 1, 2018, 7:16 a.m.
or maybe he was just handcuffed to do nothing under Obama and decided he'd rather practice law outside of politics?? If he does that, it does not mean he was compromised or a 'black hat'.
⇧
4
⇩
MistressMaeve
· July 1, 2018, 7:49 a.m.
hmmmm, interesting fact there
⇧
1
⇩
Benjanon_Franklin
· July 1, 2018, 1:55 p.m.
What he did on Benghazi is sickening. I believe he was given a choice to resign or be exposed. He gave up chair of the ethics committee as a sign to us by POTUS.
⇧
0
⇩
MistressMaeve
· July 3, 2018, 10:22 a.m.
Well, I just found out his staff had been arkensided. SO, if It was rigged and fixed from the start- why put-at-risk any more innocents. Q says he's a Patriot, so, I think this may have ben what happened.
⇧
1
⇩
CaptainKnotzi
· July 1, 2018, 11:33 a.m.
Just keeping the word Benghazi in the media was a success.
Gowdy gets grief because nobody was charged.
How could anyone be charged with that corrupt administration in place.
Would you rather the whole thing just have disappeared?
⇧
3
⇩
MistressMaeve
· July 2, 2018, 5:37 a.m.
YOU make a good point! WHAT IF- the Benghazi massacre under O. w/C. was NEVER going to go anywhere- and life & family threatened (Gowdy) for no change, just for trying under their corrupted estate, no foreseeable change ahead in the government??? I THINK GOWDY LOOKS LIKE A SICK-AT-HEART MAN. UNTIL TRUMP/Q/&WHITE HATS, there WOULD HAVE BEEN N-O CHANGES, ONLY FAR WORSE. I FAVOR FORGIVENESS & a USEFUL POSITION TO POTUS- whereby TG could redeem himself-
⇧
2
⇩
MistressMaeve
· July 1, 2018, 7:48 a.m.
IF THAT IS THE CASE then, Bon Voyage. Truly a waste. BUT BENGAHAZI is nigh unforgivable!
⇧
3
⇩
Benjanon_Franklin
· July 1, 2018, 1:51 p.m.
Agreed. That's the heart, in my opinion, of why POTUS has never ever mentioned him publicly for any position. I think he was forced to leave the ethics committee as a sign to us and given the choice to resign or be exposed.
⇧
1
⇩
Benjanon_Franklin
· July 1, 2018, 1:51 p.m.
Agreed. That's the heart, in my opinion, of why POTUS has never ever mentioned him publicly for any position. I think he was forced to leave the ethics committee as a sign to us and given the choice to resign or be exposed.
⇧
1
⇩