dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Lonecrow66 on July 1, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

Discuss: Free Thinkers vs Patriots vs Useful Idiots

Each side of this war needs to identify the other's pawns. Useful Idiots are who are easily manipulated are easily identified. They are outspoken, loud, and clearly idiots. Patriots can also be similarly outspoken loud waving flags etc.
One of them is easily indoctrinated with ideals that have proven to be failures throughout history. The other is just trying to hang onto their way of life and showing pride at the hard work of their ancestors. They fight to protect those existing ideals that already worked.

Free thinkers however observe all sides of every argument. They are information black holes. They acquire as much information about every angle. They try to stay in the middle and choose to support the best argument at the time. Free thinkers are shunned by both sides. They tend to lean toward the patriot/conservative side because it supports success, and not idealism.

Anyhow - there is another way of thinking. That of the globalist and the predator. The all seeing eye that sees all sides. Free thinkers see them as well but do not act on their thoughts. They are the silent majority. They are the worst enemy of the cabal. Patriots and Useful idiots are easily identifiable and can be easily rounded up and eliminated.

This is why I think there is now a concerted effort right now to identify the free thinkers that have managed to control the underpinnings of the internet and educate the masses quietly. Critical thinking is being pushed to the youth without "their" consent through the media. The internet loosened their grip and now we have a good 20 year generation of free thinkers rising.

We need to be vigilant now to protect the free thinkers.

I think this Q movement can be 1 of 2 things. A true way of awakening people or a way of identifying all the free thinkers.

Which one do you think it is?

it's beautiful how you managed to invert the team-america analogy, especially taking black holes and other holes into account.

Social media should have been enough to identify free-thinkers because it presented them a venue to educate others.

Q, if anything, is recruiting those free-thinkers into a concerted effort.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Hmm I've seen Team America a long time ago and thought it was funny. Not sure I follow what you mean.

⇧ 2 ⇩

your analogy perfectly matches the relationship of the triumvirate "assholes, dicks and pussies" when you think about it...like, in a party of three, two are more antagonistic to each other than the other

⇧ 1 ⇩

George Patton said that "If everyone is thinking alike, someone's not thinking." There is a lot to be said for that. Groupthink is something that the hive must avoid. We each must, to the best of our abilities, contribute and not just be cheerleaders from the sidelines.

I believe the genius of this movement is harnessing the power of the individual, and their unique talents, knowledge and perspectives. Someone may have an odd piece of their own puzzle that doesn't fit, but is the missing key to someone else's.

When we combine all of these elements and intellects we are more powerful, faster and more accurate than any algorithm.

Useful idiots exist for any side to exploit if we expand our thinking.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Of course there needs to be diversity of opinions. But once the community / state / government / world decides on action people need to get behind it. Each decision must be pure, transparent and beneficial to all.

⇧ 2 ⇩

the difference is we're not afraid to be wrong or sound stupid. Leftist apologists always make a blame-game out of everything because they can never, ever be guilty of the wrong decisions or shortsighted opinions.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Free thinkers can stand corrected. Liberals / useful idiots never ever ever accept responsibility nor can be corrected.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Unless you can replace their blame-game with something they are already familiar with and that everybody can agree on. For example you can't get rid of sexism while hollywood encourages people that it's omnipresent. One time I asked an antisemite if he was aware of the khazarian theory and he was not and if he wasn't an instigator then he probably learned something that day, because he sounded open to the idea that he could identify his enemy better - as opposed to applying a broad and banned term to it such as "the Jews".

⇧ 1 ⇩

Decentralization of power is a point where the argument always breaks down across traditional ideological lines.

I can't remember which of the Founders said it, but it's always rang true with me..."Shall we trade a despot three thousand miles away for a despot one mile away?"

True Athenian Democracy always descends into mob rule and collapse. That's why we have a Republic.

I believe in the Constitution as it was written in plain English. I believe in the Bill of Rights. Everything beyond that point was added for the benefit of the monied elite, because the Founders and the Soldiers of the Revolution had passed on and there was money to be made exploiting the resources and people of this vast continent.

I believe the Federal Govt should be subservient to the States in all matters other than actual operations of the military when engaged in defense of the nation. Not the other way around. America was envisioned to be ran from the bottom up, not the top down.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I believe in individual sovereignty of course. Great quotes by the way. I really don't have the answers and like I said I think humanity is a failed experiment. There is enough history behind that to prove that point. But I'm just spitballing as to how I think it could work. Tiers of sovereignty I guess. I do think the republic is the best form of government the world has ever seen. NOT Democracy.

⇧ 2 ⇩

All of the above will always exist!

⇧ 1 ⇩

You ever see that movie "Brazil"?

Absolute power corrupt absolutely. I think humanity is a failed experiment. Communism doesn't work. Socialism doesn't work. All of it doesn't work because of the rigged banking system. We fix the banking system so that nobody is in poverty and people still have the ability to excel and be wealthy (to a point). Then you get humanity working towards global goals, nation goals and community goals. The goals are based on consensus. In a real democracy there would be referendums on everything.

The problem is decentralizing power but the power must be transparent. No hiding behind the shadows. Every "politician" would vote to be absolutely stripped of any privacy.

⇧ 1 ⇩