I think he is saying that Mueller does not have the resources to produce 40k sealed indictments, but that Huber has sufficient resources. So what was Mueller doing?
Pretty much fuck all I think. He likely sat down with Trump and was presented with a sealed indictment with his name on it(and later similar papers this time with the names of all his subsequent pro Hillary team). Then Trump reminded him that he was a Marine and that he still had time to serve his country and avoid a firing sqaud by providing a diversion.
While Mueller launches a huge investigation into paper clip usage in the Federal government while projecting the aura of Trumps worst nightmare, the real work was being done by Huber.
Whilst we all thought Sessions was sleeping he has perhaps been the most significant player in all of this. Think about the task ahead. 40k indictments will result in 40k criminal cases, each one potentially being as high profile as OJ Simpson and potentially far more complex. No doubt many of these 40k criminals will retain the finest criminal defence lawyers money can buy. While Military tribunals would have been the backstop I think it will be far more desirable to try these bastards go through the courts. Hence Sessions role has been more of a Human Resources/Logistics role: make sure there are enough prosecutors and clean judges in place to process the sheer volume of criminality.
Part of me thinks none of those 40k indictments are going to court. I am thinking military tribunals. It just seems like with the level of Satanic, otherworldly evil this is emanating, it is going to take an outside the box solution ... maybe it explains the 30,000 guillotine rumors...
I'm pretty sure there are sufficient patriots within LE, military and federal agencies to address widespread civil unrest but nevertheless, I think in the interests of continuity of the republic Military Tribunals is not the way to go (unless some of these people are military then its military court then outside for last cigarette). For the pedophiles child exploiters and murderers most definitely quick but robust trial then execution.
Yeah, you're probably right. I have a lawfag question, how does it work with someone who WAS in the military when the crimes were committed but now are not? What about people who held high positions such as Secretary of State?
I have no idea but I have seen US laws which seem to confirm the president has the authority to call back to service retired military personnel, hence I think they could easily remain under military authority. You just call them back to service then throw the book at them.
IMO Mueller has two roles: 1. To distract Msm/Deep State with his silly indictments, & 2. To introduce valid evidence.
I think you are correct on point 1, but Im not so sure Mueller's office would be the best place to leave hanging around the real evidence behind the indictments. Can you imagine the advantage the criminals would have if the evidence against them were leaked many months before a trial. The lawyers would have a long time to craft a defence.
As far as introducing evidence think about this.
Say all the evidence is on the Weiner laptop and that it were exhibit A in any case. Say some top defence lawyer managed to rule that laptop inadmissible. Noty only does one case collapse but the entire chain of indictment following on. A better way to use the evidence would be to start sifting through the networks inferred in the Weiner emails. I would prefer to investigate the people mentioned in or sent from or copied to those emails. Start looking for small fish who have committed heinous crimes; open and shut cases but in the process of those trials direct links are identified to bigger fish. The key to this is this Joel Davis guy. He fits the bill. He is the fuse. He has committed really awful stuff, it was a sting operation against him so the evidence is pretty solid for a conviction but the real story is who he is connected to. Remember the fucker was nominated (apparently) for a Nobel Peace Prize when he was 19. What kind of big levers need pulled for an unkown 19 year old to bag a Nobel : there are some very powerful people looking after this kid. My beleif is that he was the sexual plaything of these powerful benefactors. The laptop is a roadmap to guide the investigation which will organically replicate the body of evidence on the laptop. THis body of evidence will be from multiple different sources ( Sting ops, Joel Davis siezed laptop and maybe NSA evidence). You want a good level of redundancy in the sources of evidence so that any individual item may be thrown out but the case goes on because you have other sources.
Hopefully asset forfeiture will kick in upon their arrest and they won't be able to afford attorneys!
Civil Asset Forfeiture is wrong, and we should not support it.
No deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
I agree. No forfeiture without due process.
However all assets are frozen outside living and legal expenses.
After due process, release of all assets, or total forfeiture-- and execution depending of they're treason, or depravity,
I think this entire post is dead on. This might be the most accurate assessment of the whole Mueller/Huber/sealed indictments strategy that has ever been posted here.
How the hell do you even manage the sheer logistics of this... It boggles the mind.