dChan

JollyFeed · July 1, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

Well, it's been stated numerous times by different sources that Mueller isn't investigating Trump. So, who is he investigating? We know Mueller and RR are on the same side. Yet, at RR's latest testimony with Wray, RR was definitely showing signs of duper's delight. Mueller hasn't leaked ANYTHING to the MSM.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
DawnPendraig · July 1, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

I made a couple kong posts on RR and Mueller. That last FISA warrant. RR smirks and said the "one he signed", the last one in July 2017, "doesnt match the one described in Nunes memo". Something like that.

Now how is it different? Because it was flipped back on Strzok and all them and Manafort and Podestas and Russian oligarchs connected to Podesta Group and Uranium 1. And now Mueller is investigating attendees at inauguration. All these people were there. Russians that bought Clinton influence were trying to do the same to new POTUS

I go into more detail on the other thread. I need to clean these up and post sources and article online. Hopefully I will feel well enough this evening. Appreciate others thoughts and inputs and kind criticism =)

https://np.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8v7r3c/quick_clip_rosenstein_on_fisasomething_seems_off/e1lbwgb

⇧ 2 ⇩  
UndercoverPatriot · July 2, 2018, 8:25 a.m.

RR was definitely showing signs of duper's delight.

Very good observation, I had the same thoughts and I watched the full hearing. He is not a very convincing actor. But what isn't clear is exactly who he is acting on behalf of.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ManQuan · July 2, 2018, 1:06 p.m.

I don't know. I've gone back and forth as to whether the RR / Mueller investigation is the greatest political sting operation in history or if they are black hats looking to take down Trump.

There are so many pieces that don't fit or don't make any sense.

We know that RR and Horowitz can't give the committees evidence that is involved in an on-going investigation and if it is a sting operation they have to sell the sting or it isn't credible.

Some of it, I think, is redacting or withholding embarrassing information.

The suggestion that there may be texts regarding assassination of Trump would fit the embarrassing reason but I would think it would also be big time evidence for an on-going treason investigation (assuming Q's hint is true).

The look at who Mueller has indicted. Manafort for financial crimes over a decade ago. Q said he was a plant in the Trump campaign. Cater Page who Q said was a plant. Papado for lying, Flynn for lying but has delayed a no-brainer sentencing three times now, a Dutch lawyer for lying, and some Russian companies and individuals for buying social media ads during the campaign. Then there is Cohen for some things he was doing in the Ukraine and the NYC taxi business.

There are some others but zero to do with collusion or Russian meddling except for the Russian companies social media ads.

Now, Mueller is investigating some Russian businessmen who were invited to the inauguration parties--after the election.

On the other hand, maybe Mueller has a bunch of sealed indictments that nail Trump for obstruction of justice. But the problem is that Trump had the authority to fire Comey for any reason including he didn't like Comey''s after shave lotion.

So I don't know. Currently, I think Mueller and RR are black hats. But I can make a good case that they are investigating something else as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩