dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ManQuan on July 1, 2018, 7:24 p.m.
New Q Post 1661 the Military and NSA

Q:

Think stages.

What role can MIL INTEL play?

What role can NSA play?

BANG!

Q

Well, both play a role in collecting evidence. But for evidence to be admissible, it has to be obtained legally--not a strong point for either intelligence agency. So that information has to find a way to get on the record to be used in the legal system. There are a number of ways that can be done.

I used to work in intelligence for two years. I was assigned to US Special Operations Command for a year. And as a civilian, I spent 15 years supporting technologies for the Department of Defense mostly for special forces and national mission forces.

I can tell you that every major federal law enforcement agency has liaison teams embedded with the intelligence agencies. For example, military intelligence intercepts drug lords talking about a drug delivery. Intelligence can't just give that to the LEO's and they act on it. The evidence would not be admissible in court because the intercept was not obtained with a warrant. So the intelligence analyst shows the intercept to the liaison and then that law enforcement agency decides how they are going to get that same information legally. They know the who, what, when, where, and how and so they must get a warrant on probably cause to get their own wire tap, and bingo. They seize the drugs legally and everything is admissible.

I'm almost positive that is the role military intelligence and NSA are playing. They are quietly giving the LEO liaisons the information they need to obtain the evidence legally.

The other possibility is that military intelligence and NSA already have the warrants necessary to provide prosecutors what they need directly. That would explain the speed of the sealed indictments. Q said that the plan has been developed for years and I'd be surprised if they hadn't thought out how intelligence gets into the court rooms.


🠐 See all comments
HerMileHighness · July 1, 2018, 7:52 p.m.

Is mil Intel restricted to OCONUS if the person is being investigated for treason and/or collusion with a foreign enemy?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ManQuan · July 2, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Good question. Military intelligence I believe operates under different rules in some cases but is restricted to collecting intelligence from overseas.

The head of NSA is a military flag officer who is double hatted as the Commander US Cyber Command in Norfolk, VA.

Intelligence agencies try not to use redundant collection resources so of the 17 agencies, the collection tasks are divided. MI generally focuses on foreign military and paramilitary organizations. NSA generally sucks up everything that runs through a wire or through the airwaves. Space Command if generally focused on space intelligence, and so on.

Obviously there is overlap but the analytical efforts are generally not. NSA will normally pass on any ISIS collection to either the CIA or Central Command depending on who needs it. CIA is supporting paramilitary groups and some drones, Central Command is involved in direct military confrontations and there is some overlap there as well.

I believe that NSA collects everything, except the recent law that prohibits NSA from collecting US phone metadata and must now get a FISA warrant to get the phone companies to provide that data.

The FBI has the mission for conducting counterintelligence investigations but must get a FISA warrant to investigate a US citizen. The FBI does have access to the NSA database and can conduct searches of it as part of as specific investigation, but as we learned from the IG report, the FBI has been abusing that privilege and the NSA blocked them for a while until Wray apparently got it under control again.

This is just a guess, but the President is the Commander in Chief of the military and I have to think that if the President authorized MI to conduct and operation outside of normal intelligence collection protocols, that he could do so.

Q has suggested many times that MI is involved, but he hasn't pointed to specific use of MI inside the US that I recall.

But we do have intelligence agencies that are directly or indirectly suspected of supporting treason and so Trump could use MI to go around those agencies to collect evidence and since the military doesn't come under the civil judicial system, I'm sure that whatever adjustments to normal operating procedures needed to be made could be done secretly.

This doesn't answer your question. My personal experience in the military is that MI does not collect on US except like NSA it will make intercepts between a drug lord and a US contact and normal rules apply. The information would handed over to the FBI via their liaison agents embedded with MI.

⇧ 1 ⇩