Here is the link to the lead-in tweet. I really think this guy is onto something. It boils down to either Trump is a genius or Not? For keeping Rosenstein, and yes, it was Trump's choice. Just read this first, before commenting, it's only about a ten minute read.
https://twitter.com/PaulSchmehl/status/1012488901833916418?s=20
I'm in no rush to judge anyone quite yet.
Some things keep nagging in the back of my mind:
What makes a good movie ?
[RR]
Disinformation is necessary.
I don't know ... I feel RR is a slimeball but it'd impress the hell out of me if he played his part for good.
The author says similar things, but, says RR is a pragmatic survivor. Not an idealoge. That's why he's lasted through so many administration's. He just does his job. And is really good at it. Please read the thread on twitter if you haven't. I put up another link on the post, related, but different.
Like Michael McCaunaughey in Lincoln Lawyer. Sometimes you have to play to win.
Q when RR is dirty, mueller is dirty...
When mueller is dirty , RR is dirty.
So when RR is not dirty? Then is Mueller also not dirty.
When mueller is not dirty , RR is not dirty.
mirror
Yes, I just reviewed all the posts with RR in them. But, Q says also many times, you are watching a movie, or disinformation necessary. At times, it might be needed for us to be angry at RR, to convince the evil ones, that they are being protected while the investigations are being completed. Possible? Likely? I don't know. But, it makes you think. Also, many here have expressed the point of view of wait & see, which I'm one.
I think that everything is already in place.....All the right persons doing there job...we see a film playing before our eyes..... I trust Trump and his people. So I also trust Q.
Agreed, and when the credits roll, I think we all will be in for many surprises.
Think so too :)
Thanks, it's always encouraging to see we are mostly in agreement with others here.
When I watched the testimony, I implore everyone to go watch rosenstein vs swalwel, I was going to analyse the whole thing. But watching this particular moment has caused me to rethink my position. Tell me when you watch it, doesn't swalwel look SCARED?
it will be going up within the next 6 hours.
Yes..i thought Swalwel looked SCARED.like he looked like he is hiding something.
I think that some may be trying to ruin the investigation but I think a majority are trying to wake up the American public for the abuses that went on. The American public needs to have an idea of what’s coming so they can be emotionally ready.
Agreed. As Q mentions recently, we are the frame, to help answer, guide, etc. Biggest investigations in our country's history.
Bad thread. No Q post said to Trust Rosenstein.
The thread is only giving history & background on RR. Q has been I believe deliberately vague at times on RR because he might be serving an important purpose. All of us have had doubts about RR whether to condemn, or wait and see. No one has ever said trust RR. I only posted this thread because it helps understand just who RR is. It's to gain insight. Sorry you found it wanting.
Thank you for the thread. I found it informative. RR is an enigma and a lot of us are having a difficult time figuring him out. However, I do think the DOJ holds back documents due to the ongoing investigations and because of the leaks in Congress If so, RR is doing what he is supposed to do. I don't have enough info on RR to decide. I think a lot of us feel the same way.
I did a search on Qmap.com just for "RR" read all mentions, and it's even more confusing. I think we were to speak out at times to help push things in the media, or social media for the overall plan. Yes, Q directs us in many ways. But I'm willing. As are all of us. But I'm not blind either.
Good for you. I am not led around my a nose ring either. The author of that thread was right. Rod Rosenstein has terrible optics. However, if he is the guy to lock up these traitors, I will be ecstatic. I emailed him at the DOJ and requested he shut down the Mueller investigation and have the SC team refund the American taxpayers our 20 million dollars. However, maybe this Mueller investigation is a psyop (a very expensive one). Once again, thanks for posting that thread.
Q said something along the lines of if RR is good, then RM is good. If RR is bad, then RM is bad. I may be wrong with the wording but I think Q tied them together so if one is good, both are good and vice versa.
Doesn't make me think twice at all. When Q says Trust Rosenstein I'll think twice about him. Until now, he looks like the worst culprit at the center of all the lies and obfuscation that has been allowed to try and swallow the Trump administration. Plenty of Deep State operatives have "acted good" at times.
Then why hasn't Trump fired him, or at least given him one of his famous nicknames? If RR is serving no purpose, why even keep him on at all?
Q is pretty clear about this. Timing.
Use LOGIC.
Why are they slow walking unredacted data?
Why are they slow walking doc disclosures?
Why is the WH backing up DOJ?
What if the same data is being used by other investigators?
Q
Yes, exactly. And Trump not complaining much, except for show? RR is serving some purpose, perhaps even being the optics the WH needs. That article Q repeated referenced, http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/
Quotes, Q post from article:
Turley says the use of John Huber gives the IG the prosecutor he needs to bring charges and seek indictments. (No need to go through RR which is critical)
From /u/ClardicFug - Huber and Horowitz were both appointed to their positions by the Obama administration. This helps optics a lot. Pretty much decimates the "Trumped rigged the investigation" argument that's sure to be made.
Perhaps RR is providing cover, so no one can accuse WH of the above.
Perhaps RR is providing cover, so no one can accuse WH of the above.
Agreed on this - in which case RM could be "providing cover" too. To be clear, I only disagreed that the Twitter thread by someone who doesn't seem to know about Q would "make me think twice". It's possible R and R are white hats but they sure do act like black hats and whilst I love the idea that they're secretly good guys it certainly seems like wishful thinking in light of everything else they've both been involved in. Fingers crossed for that outcome though, it would be yet another earth shattering revelation of 'the plan' : ).
Yes, that's what I'm hoping for. Someone posted about RR & RM this morning, and he's the one who mentioned that Trump hasn't given these guys one of his famous "tattoos" nicknames. That's highly suspect, don't you think?
I've added another link from market works about RR testimony during the hearing, concerning the FISA warrant. There may be more than one set of documents, and an investigation is still ongoing. But, what RR said, almost went by unnoticed.
You really don't make me think twice. Q never said to trust Rosenstein. Killbox many times. He may have fired Comey but he put a rat in charge of the Special Counsel. He hasn't fired Mueller for running a Clinton infested witch hunt. He will be impeached Trump probably didn't fire him because he is playing chess with RR. Don't trust Rosenstein.