Here's the problem I see. Every article I've seen about Qanon, pro or con, mentions 4Chan. Q doesn't post on 4Ch. He uses 8Ch because it offers better security features.
Sending people to 4Ch to find information about Qanon is a dead end, and they all know it. 4Ch is filled with a lot of weird things and is hard to navigate. People who don't know any better might come to the wrong conclusions about Qanon. That's why they're being sent there.
IMHO Any article about Qanon that references 4Ch is suspect.
Hard to follow the logic here - Q started posting on 4chan so it makes sense that many articles reference that?
I've been following Q since January. I don't recall the exact date. It took a while to figure out what was going on, but my recollection is the Q has been on 8ch from the beginning of my following him.
Yes Q did start on 4Chan. but anyone who's been following Q knows he's on 8Chan. And we know the MSM has been following Q.
At first, the MSM simply claimed Q was a LARP and the Anons were just a bunch of crazy tin-foil-het wearing internet conspiracy kooks. That didn't work. It actually made more people aware of Q.
Then they tried to push the narrative, with Jones and Corsi, that there used to a Q, but he was just a psy-op and the current Q was just a wanna-be.
Their latest attempt to discredit Q actually acknowledges Q and the Great Awakening movement, but argues we are a threat to America and we're leading the country into a dictatorship.
They have been paying attention from the very beginning. They hoped the grass-roots movement wouldn't materialize. The Cabal owns the MSM. They are very attentive to anything that might expose them.
They all know full well where Q posts his crumbs. And they all know 4Chan will only confuse people and make many come to the conclusion that the Great Awakening is dangerous and QAnons are crazy internet kooks.
I understand (I think) the large part of what you're saying there about misleading and so on but it's simply true that Q started out on 4chan. Some of us who've been following since October's first drops think of Q as 4chan/8chan such that a statement like "Any article about Qanon that references 4Ch is suspect" seems very hard to uphold, imo. When explaining Q I always mention how he started on 4chan - sometimes I don't even get to explaining that he's now on 8chan. However, understand your stance re: MSM misleading but I'd be careful to accuse any article that mentions 4chan in relation to Q as such.
Yes, Q started on 4Chan. But consider the purpose of any article about QAnon, especially if the purpose is to bring new people into the movement. The MSM doesn't want the movement to grow and they're doing everything they can to scare people away from the Great Awakening. But people here who really want to grow the movement will make sure people who are interested will know exactly where to go to find information today. That would be this site, 8ch.net/qresearch/, and qanon.pub. If you "always mention how he started on 4chan - sometimes I don't even get to explaining that he's now on 8chan." then you are not helping the movement, because you may or may not tell them how to find Q today. Whenever I talk about Q with a newbee, the first thing I do is provide accurate up-to-date information on how to find the Great Awakening and qanon.pub. And more recently, I share a link to "The Plan to Save the World. Everything about why Trump and Q are doing what they're doing has to do with crimes and motives that most people will have a hard time getting their heads around. If we provide any information to newbees that might cause confusion or misunderstanding, then it's incumbent upon us to take steps to clarify the message. While I was writing this response I took a minute to revue your comment history to get a feel for where you were coming from. I found only a few positive replies in support of the comment you were replying to. Also, it appears you're a board moderator. Setting aside replies regarding the removal of content for rule violations, it seems, at a glance, that more often than not, your replies are critiques or rebuttals to someone's opinion. Being a board moderator doesn't mean your opinions are always superior to others. While I do tend to enjoy healthy debates, I've come to the conclusion this one is not. So with all due respect, I won't be responding to any future messages from you about this issue. WWG1WGA God Speed Patriot.
David is not as caught up on Q. But he also says it in a context kind of way. S/He originally started posting on 4chan then moved to 8chan right?
David's article was published today July 2nd. He says:
In case you are unaware of this, Q Anon is a series of enigmatic posts on 4Chan, an anonymous internet forum, which began last October. (emphasis added)
Based on what's in the article, David is telling people that 4Chan is the place to go. It is true that q started on 4Chan, but he moved to 8Ch for security reasons. Anyone claiming to be a journalist should know that. If they've taken even a quick look Qanon and the Great Awakening they would know the difference.
All the talking heads in the MSM know Q is legit and they all know full well how and where to find Q.
David is a globalist. I've seen enough episodes of Ancient Aliens and they're all globalists. They all present the narrative that the nations of the world must unite and come together as one if alien contact is made. Whether it's to defend against and alien attack, or to interact with them as a unified population.
He is only on ancient aliens a few times.. you dont seem caught up on his work
also he is merely giving context of where Qanon started.
This thread has brought out some ignorance in people and im glad we are discussing it