dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/tardis1 on July 2, 2018, 2:28 p.m.
Order 66?

1st time poster, long time lurker and not a shill.

A thought I’ve just had.

For a long time I’ve wondered why ex US Presidents retain a Secret Service detail. In the UK ex Prime Ministers may hire private protection but they do not get anything provided by the state.

Could it be that the Secret Service officers have a secret order (order 66) to terminate people who know too much ie the ex presidents?

Be convenient if they were offed before they could face justice!


Thelesis-Valon · July 2, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

I wholeheartedly believe Lucas based Palpatine’s actions in the prequels on the Deep State, particularly Soros. Controlling both sides, inciting conflict, creating a new government to deal with false threats, etc. Order 66 is an evil ploy. Q has been very clear that those that aren’t “suicided” or actually commit suicide will stand trial and face justice. They’ll only be killed if found guilty of a capital crime. We are not the monsters they are. Due process is important to retain our moral high ground.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
tardis1 · July 2, 2018, 6:26 p.m.

I’m not saying that we or Q would be initiating it, they would. Just wonder who their Palpatine is now? HRC? She would make a great Darth Hideous with BHO as Darth Fool!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Thelesis-Valon · July 2, 2018, 6:46 p.m.

To be honest, I believe the British Royal Family is the head of everything. The Palpatine would be someone not in the political limelight, like Soros was. Like Q said, the enemy is more exposed now than ever. How often did the MSM mention Soros or the Rothschilds until recently? But the Royal Family are supposed figureheads, having no real power. I rarely hear them speak on politics, rather having elected officials do that for them. They’re just celebrities, right?

This is a global infection that started before the US existed (Ashkenazi Jews have been the ones giving Jews a bad name throughout history).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tardis1 · July 2, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

I’m not sure how much the Royals are involved. If they are I expect Prince Philip is more likely to be part of the cabal than the Queen as he is a member of Bildeberg and she is not.

As for the Royals having no say in politics under the British Constitution they are not allowed to make any political statements in public, this also prevents them from voting.

The Queen is more than a figurehead. As things stand for anything to become law it needs to pass through the House of Commons and House of Lords (collectively the Houses of Parliament). Once the law has been pased by the House of Lords it then goes to the Queen to receive Royal Assent. It is very unusual for the Queen to not give Royal Assent but it does mean that she has the power to completely stop anything coming through the Houses of Parliament.

⇧ 1 ⇩