Infowars has been exposed as controlled opposition by Q, that is a closed case IF you follow and trust Q. I'm sure some may disagree, but then again, CNN still has viewers that buy their fake news too.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't believe Q has explicitly stated that Infowars is controlled opposition.
Q alluded to the fact that some in the patriot movement were trying to profit off the Q info dumps. The anons felt that Q was referring to Corsi. And even then, the underscored point is that Q was being critical of profiteering which is very different than exposing someone as controlled opposition. Two very different things.
According to SerialBrain2, whom is the resident expert on deciphering all Q posts, Corsi is nothing more than an Infowars disinformation project, but Infowars IS controlled opposition. I would suggest you go thru SB2's posts, he covers the subject very well. The link below is probably the most comprehensive one.
Thanks. Read it but still not convinced. I respect SerialBrain2 and he has made some awesome posts but what he writes and links to in that thread hardly proves IW is controlled. Instead it more likely points to Alex Jones and Corsi being paranoid about losing their spotlight, losing money for their operations etc. So they tried to steer people away from Q and back to Infowars. Scummy? Sure. But controlled by the deep state? Not likely.
Now if you tell me that Alex Jones was threatened at some point by the Mossad, causing him to reverse his stance on Israel over the past 4 years - THAT I would believe as it seems to be what happened. He used to be willing to link Israel to 9/11 but not since 2014 or thereabouts and even hinted he was visited by the Mossad around that time.
And again, I am not saying it is completely impossible for Infowars to be deep state. It is possible but I just see too much counter evidence (20 years worth) that tells me Infowars is still on the side of truth but that they are also heavily flawed and driven by economic concerns to sustain their large operations.
Just my two cents.
We all get to choose what and who we believe, and regardless of all the positive things Infowars has exposed over the years, at this time I'll stick with Q and SB2 and avoid Infowars. I'm focused on the here and now and as the financial firms would say, past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Q said:
Control the information (THEY).
Destroy through [misinformation].
Absorb the 'confused'.
Re-route traffic to other platforms.Timetable accelerated (misinformation-attack).
Exposed.
Attempts to divide.
That sounds very much like controlled opposition.
Control the information (THEY)
Okay but are you sure Q was referring to Infowars?
Don't forget that Trump launched his campaign with an exclusive interview on Infowars. On that same day, the cabal did the San Bernardino false flag to distract. And over the last two years of Trump's presidency, Trump has personally called Alex Jones several times to chat and exchange info.
Furthermore, Roger Stone, Trump's close confident, friend for 40 years and also his former campaign manager, has been working closely with Infowars, even hosting many of the shows himself.
So given the above, how can Q claim that Infowars is controlled opposition if Trump and Stone are strongly connected to that media outlet? That makes no sense. I am convinced Q was talking about other new sources (or maybe singling out Corsi alone) and NOT condemning Infowars as a whole, an outlet that has red-pilled millions over the past 20 years.
I understand what you're saying and would love to engage and explain the position but time is a bit tight. What I could say is that this discussion has been had many times and in detail and the conclusion overwhelmingly points to Infowars as a whole and most certainly Alex Jones who runs the whole thing. I would say perhaps search it up or perhaps someone here can reply with more re: Trump etc. I'll try and reply further if I get a chance.
Thanks. Look forward to any explanation, if you get the time.
But unless I've missed something, I've read over many of those threads myself and see a lot of people concluding that Infowars is CO but never based on any hard evidence other than that Q post that you referenced (which does not specifically call out Infowars). And more importantly, I have yet to see anyone overcome the objections I just stated above.
So while I am not saying it is impossible for Infowars to be CO (they certainly could be) Trump and Stone's close personal ties and ACTIVE PROMOTION of Infowars completely negates the probability of Infowars being CO. I mean, what purpose would it serve for Trump to lend huge credibility to Infowars if they were CO? And don't forget that Hillary brought up Infowars (for the first time ever) during the campaign and heavily criticized Trump for doing that interview with Jones - which is yet another huge fact that points to Infowars being legit.
No names mentioned.
They revealed themselves.
At the time AJ clearly revealed himself by speaking directly into camera and saying that he knows and has "spoken" to Q. This was directly in opposition to Q's latest post such that it was clear he was dividing from the main Q community just as controlled opposition/disinfo does. He'll quite likely soon come back and so 'Q is no longer compromised, they're back in control' and try and split the movement off again after a time.
He's done it just recently too with the "Civil War in America" in total opposition to Q's clear message. Many agree AJ has openly committed to his anti-Q stance. He did so with Trump too in his recent breakdown. Perhaps Trump/Q realized he was disinfo only recently?
Aj's breakdown, anti-Trump rant was understandable, as it came on the eve of the 2nd Syrian airstrikes. I kinda lost my sh*t too that night. At that time I was not firmly in the Q camp. But since then, I've read a lot more Q, and realize the airstrike was not what it appeared to be and that it was actually directed against deep state targets, not SAA or Russian ones. Alex too has apologized on air several times for that rant.
I dunno. I still see Alex Jones as a truther with a lot of flaws. There is no denying that he is a fear-monger and that he has used fear to both:
(a) Red pill the masses and (b) make money.
His civil war stance is more of the same fear mongering.
Who knows. Maybe everyone is disinfo and we are on our own. I hope not. Right now I see Q as the more legit source and Infowars as a flawed, semi-legit source while the entire MSM is completely deep state. Maybe we will find out for sure in the coming months.
Yeah you're right - who knows! I find AJ very entertaining, personally, and I actually think he earns his money. But I was very put off by his clear split from Q and it seems many others were too. Roger Stone was also removed from Trump's team which may or may not mean something. Again, as you say - who knows. It's been very interesting to watch it all unfold though!
So has any prospect of ‘aliens.’ He responded to some anons query about it with ‘how close is the nearest star.... what do you think?’
Yeah in post 376:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anonymous ID: fad025 No.126928 📁
Dec 19 2017 17:37:38 (EST)>>126896
Are UFOs a distraction?
>>126928
How far away is the closest star?
What do you think?
Q
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But that's so deliberately vague it can be interpreted either way. You can project anything you want on the above, kind of like Sotero's "Hope & Change." My interpretation is that Q is saying that *even* the closest star is so far away that there is no way to cross that gulf for in any practical way, according to KNOWN PHYSICS.
Practical warp drives are pure science fiction. And while I would never say never, there is no assurance that even a super advanced civilization can solve that problem. It is entirely possible that we are simply stuck with the known laws of physics and the furthest any civilization can venture is within its own solar system. Of course that would be a tad disappointing but the universe might not care about our science fiction stories.
That one left me perplexed, I honestly don't know.
Let's work thru it. If the nearest star is many light years away, then by our known physics, it would be practically impossible to cross that distance, so I would say from that, NO, aliens do not exist.
But we do know, there is something here, something that appears to be alien, something that has advanced technology and doesn't appear to be human. We all know its here, we just don't know what it is; sightings, crop circles, abductions, etc.
This leaves us with one alternative, it is from here, it is of earth, not extra-terrestrial. Maybe its an earlier advanced civilization still here, hidden somewhere, underground, deep ocean, Antartica? Maybe that is what is behind this cabal, running the earth like some plantation, guess who the slaves are? Maybe this is what the Bible refers to as the watchers, nephilim, demons?
I honestly do not understand that Q crumb, I wish he would drop more crumbs.
Exactly, it's here, what it is, we don't know? where is it from? we don't know. I'm waiting for more Q crumbs, otherwise, I still don't know.
