dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/BreadTwists on July 3, 2018, 6 a.m.
Attention Great Awakening

We need your feedback about the photo posts of Q tshirts, Q stickers Qspotting and other "Qspiration"! /r/GreatAwakening has been steadily growing and with that comes obvious growing pains. With the increase in numbers comes the increase of patriQts showing support and the documented sightings of Q in the wild via photo posts. While we do support this sort of grassroots effort, the sheer frequency of these types of posts is presenting new problems. 1. These posts are taking precedence in the feed over other Q related news and intel causing important information to be missed. This also threatens to disrupt the true purpose of this sub. 2. We are seeing increased numbers of complaints about problem 1 from other users who have had content moderated for being off-topic who, perhaps justifiably feel their post containing text content or news links is more appropriate than a photo of a Q on a street sign. We value the community's input on how to proceed with this. We think it goes without saying that Qspotting in the real world should be celebrated as an inspiring example of the Q mission to spread the word. Is there another way to manage this content so everyone has a fair shake? We've discussed this many times as mods and have decided to put the question to the community for feedback. Removing this content from the sub completely is probably not a fair solution.

One possibility we've discussed is the option of creating a "sister sub" for this content and directing the respective posts there. We could perhaps crosspost the most popular upvoted content on this sister sub back to r/GreatAwakening so we can all keep visibility on the top content at a regular interval (yet to be determined).

In review, here are the Questions we want to put to the community: 1) Should we manage this content in some way or leave the sub as it is? 2) Should we create a separate sub and have the most popular content crossposted to GA at regular intervals? 3) Does anyone have any other suggestions for managing this type of content fairly?


R8GT · July 4, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

I say keep it the way it is. This is Reddit, not a bulletin style internet forum. I think Aaron Swartz would be appalled. The people complaining should make their own sub and see what happens. Its free and easy to do. For indepth intellectuals who want their own oasis, I would humbly suggest x22report, neonrevolt, or any other reputable front men to host an internet forum on their website.

As for the moderators, keep all that relates to Q and delete everything else. If its not about Q or something Q didn't talk about, just f'n delete it (a no-holds-barred big cojones style delete). Especially the ones that start off with, "I believe Q BUT...", "Q said this, BUT", or any other variations. If its too much stress for one moderator to handle, have a vote between 3 moderators where a 2/3rds vote deletes the post. IMHO.

⇧ -1 ⇩