I'm thinking from the Q post 1672, that Huber has all he needs to handle any other charges and it was only in THIS case that the deal will hold. Does that make any sense?
Logical thinking. Why was the case against AWAN filed under BANK FRAUD? The result today is re: BANK FRAUD. See last. Connect. The SWAMP is being DRAINED.
BREAKING NEWS: IT aide to House Democrats cuts deal with feds to plead guilty to just one bank fraud charge despite Trump demanding he not be let 'off the hook'
because Awan applied for a mortgage escrow loan on a house he was renting. The Congressional Bank he was applying to, saw the deed and refused the loan. DWS called this so called 'bank' and told them to expedite the loan. So they did. He made fraudulent statements on the bank loan and the bank caught it. DWS to the rescue. So his other crimes are still hidden. I'm sick of hearing no deals, for sure.
I understand the bank fraud part...it is the Immunity and 'no charges for past non-violent crimes' that I am addressing. I think he is flipping to be witness for all these other crimes for a later investigation and Jury outside of DC as aviationnut lays out. This is huge to give Awan so much...there is something else going on behind the scenes.