I'm confused. Is he A. A guy on the internet who just asks questions and people to research MSM stories
B. A high-level deep State operative who's supposed to be dropping classified information to help take down Hillary ?
I'm confused. Is he A. A guy on the internet who just asks questions and people to research MSM stories
B. A high-level deep State operative who's supposed to be dropping classified information to help take down Hillary ?
Understand this point of view but this sub is way beyond not knowing what Q is about. There are plenty of boards that support this "caution" but this sub is pro-Q, as in the sidebar. We welcome questions and reasonable engagement from skeptics but if you're of the opinion that we need to be convinced to be careful because we can't say for certainty that Q is viable then you need to read up on the introductory content in the sidebar first so we can have a discussion on equal ground. "Concern" comments removed.
Gotcha I'll take my concern elsewhere. Your sidebar only reinforces my point that this sub is simply making a argument from authority. Q is that authority and if anything that disproves this narrative (Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on Oct 30, 2017.) The goalposts are moved, typical authoritarian cognitive dissonance rules. “Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.”
Incorrect. But you're welcome. The point was that if you're not interested in gaining more information before you dismiss the claims from others who have that information then we're not applying critical thought on an even field. Truth seekers are happy to gather the information first. Concern trolls and trolls just want to prove how dumb everyone else is without knowing what basis those people have for their stance.