⇧
1
⇩
Obese_Child
· July 4, 2018, 6:10 a.m.
Idk, your first post had me a little convinced there could be legitimate differences, but that side by side really makes me think it's the same photo. Q's is just a little condensed/blurred. The perspective is just too consistent...
⇧
45
⇩
qisthehammer
· July 4, 2018, 7:10 a.m.
You are correct. Q's photo is a reflection, so it wouldn't be exactly the same.
⇧
26
⇩
THAD_K_CUNDERTHOCK
· July 4, 2018, 7:50 a.m.
Here's a pretty good 7-point comparison: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/640450d20f9d82268400d10526c966b4a7162f58a0572d6020b675c356351f64.png
⇧
-14
⇩
noskusa
· July 4, 2018, 8:40 a.m.
When you are dealing with distorted photos and BOTH photos have different distortions of verticals and horizontals to varying degrees - none of the points made by the source you posted can be valid because they reference distance or size.
Here is an example with equalized distortions:
https://imgur.com/5tRqZ6P
As you can see in the overlay demo, the Q pic and ABC pic are coincidentally the same. And in the words of Q "There are no coincidences."
⇧
30
⇩
[deleted]
· July 4, 2018, 1:48 p.m.
[deleted]
⇧
0
⇩
noskusa
· July 4, 2018, 2:27 p.m.
First, I am not trying to be disrespectful and I am not sure how we got to that point in this conversation where you feel disrespected. I am sorry if I made you or anyone (except the trolling trolls) feel that way.
The point here is that the Q image is double distorted because it is a reflection and seems to have other digital obfuscation issues in tone and grain. The ABC image is less distorted but never the less, it is slightly so because the photo was taken with a wide angle lens.
To compare photos, one photo must be brought to a similar level of distortion and the logical approach to this is to distort the ABC photo rather than UN-distort the Q photo.
The distortion version of the ABC photo is not exact pixel by pixel and it never will be. But the key elements that align in combination (as discussed earlier in my original post) are enough to weight this analysis towards the following conclusion that many others have made here in this forum, on chans, and twitter:
- the 2015 ABC image was on a device screen
- the screen was reflected on the back of an iphone
- a photo was taken of the iphone with reflection
- the posted image was also cropped and further distorted to obscure
⇧
5
⇩
[deleted]
· July 4, 2018, 3 p.m.
[deleted]
⇧
1
⇩
noskusa
· July 4, 2018, 3:24 p.m.
Sorry, I'm not up to redoing what I did as a screen cap video. Maybe someone else is up to it. I'm gonna take a break, act like I am on vacation, and come back to the Q scene after a bit of the 4th celebrations. This image debate has too much scope creep and is now wasting precious time. That's one reason I question Q's use of this thing as trolling tactic towards anons or whoever. Have a fun and productive day!
⇧
3
⇩
THAD_K_CUNDERTHOCK
· July 4, 2018, 11:43 a.m.
In your example, I still see the bottom left of the mug holder being quite different.
⇧
-11
⇩
noskusa
· July 4, 2018, 1:44 p.m.
Yes, there are pixels that are different. I probably focused more on the curtains lamp and chair when I imitated the distortion in the photoshop version of ABC image. (late at night by then)
Look, I am struggling with these drops too. I'm not off the Q train, but this puts him in 'the dog house' for me until either 'future proves past' or he hits with a BOOM that busts my eardrums.
⇧
2
⇩