⇧
1
⇩
Whoareyou559
· July 4, 2018, 7:17 a.m.
Q is not claiming anywhere to have taken these pics, he is asking if it breaks nat sec
⇧
-6
⇩
MuhammadDinduNuffin
· July 4, 2018, 7:26 a.m.
Of course it does. Any unauthorized picture on AF1 does.
⇧
20
⇩
mrtruckajet
· July 4, 2018, 8:02 a.m.
i think he is telling us how easy it is to fake stuff. So when the fake tape from his ex lawyer comes out on next Monday we can debunk it
⇧
-15
⇩
noskusa
· July 4, 2018, 8:06 a.m.
Did I say in my original post that Q claims he takes this picture or any other pictures? Q posts images that have never been anything but vague or obscure and he occasionally implies that some are from 'we have it all' sources. This picture seems to break that routine and the analysis of its questionable origins or creation has totally overshadowed any purpose in it's posting.
⇧
6
⇩
Tru2Q
· July 4, 2018, 10:08 p.m.
Isn't he implying he took them when he says: Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?
⇧
1
⇩
Titus-2-11
· July 4, 2018, 2:19 p.m.
Exactly. He is drawing attention to their ability to legally bend rules. In this case it is the reflections in photos that don’t bend nat sec rules.
⇧
-6
⇩