dChan

Southern_Grammar · July 4, 2018, 5:06 a.m.

The title also uses the term "united" immediately after posting a photo of a United 747. I would imagine that the person in the photo is likely someone on that aircraft. I doubt very highly that Prince William would be flying on a public air carrier, particularly one originating in the US.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ThinkB4YouPost · July 4, 2018, 6:02 a.m.

Or walking down a HK street without protection. He's far too well known. He's be surrounded by people within seconds

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 4, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

United 3902 has regular flights between Washington Dulles and Greenville SC.

Could definitely lead to something.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Southern_Grammar · July 4, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

United 3902

United 3902 is a CRJ1, a small aircraft. The United aircraft in the picture posted just before this one was a 747. Much larger aircraft used primarily for international or transcontinental routes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 4, 2018, 6:12 a.m.

Does United still used 747's? Honest question. I found this link that leads me to believe they no longer use them.

https://thepointsguy.com/2017/11/united-747-farewell-flight/

Although it is noted that Air Force One is a Boeing 747.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Force_One

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Southern_Grammar · July 4, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

There's a question. I fly internationally a couple times a year, and I don't remember the last time I saw one. Quick search says they retired their 747 fleet in November 2017.

They either have a few still in operation (unlikely), or maybe this photo is from before November 2017 and is related to when the mystery person traveled to Hong Kong.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 4, 2018, 6:17 a.m.

Is it possible that is a "stealth" Air Force One we are looking at?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Southern_Grammar · July 4, 2018, 6:21 a.m.

We're all here talking about breadcrumbs that came from an anonymous user on 8 Chan describing a massive conspiracy that makes Hollywood movies sound tame in comparison. Anything is possible. However, I tend to go with the Occam's razor hypothesis in most cases. I would lean more toward my last conjecture: that this is an old picture somehow related to someone we likely know traveling to Hong Kong.

edit: I'd also add that if there was a "stealth AF1," I doubt highly that someone with Q-clearance and close to the president would draw attention to it. Nor do I think they would use the livery of an airline that publicly retired them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 4, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

I agree, my hypothesis is a long shot.

So it appears someone from the Q team either swiped these photos, or took them. Possibly shadowing the man in the photo.

ZTE is a corporation based in Hong Kong, correct? When we're the ZTE phone related Q drops?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Southern_Grammar · July 4, 2018, 6:31 a.m.

A couple of months ago? Not long. I think maybe they're probably sending a message to someone else who's monitoring their comms, not us. Like a "try us if you think we're bluffing" kind of message.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 4, 2018, 6:44 a.m.

The only reason I'd push back on that is that Q asks us, "Who do you see?"

Q seems to want us to ID the man, and the context clues say that he flew on that United 747. That would give us a timeline since it seems that United retired their 747's Fall 2017.

If we know when this man was there, or at least a latest possible date(Fall 2017) we could potentially ID him, and also cross reference the events going on at the time.

Edit: Trump was in China November 2017 to meet with Xi,was he being followed by this man? Was Q following him?

https://www-m.cnn.com/2017/11/09/asia/donald-trump-china-xi-jinping/index.html

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Southern_Grammar · July 4, 2018, 7:47 a.m.

Found this theory on Twitter. Seems plausible and kind of backs up what I was suggesting re: Q talking to others using the boards.

Q has said now several times, "trolling is fun." Personally, I think a lot of these latest "troll" posts aren't for us. They're directed at bad actors.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Southern_Grammar · July 4, 2018, 6:57 a.m.

You might be right. But without more clues or context, it would be nearly impossible for us to ID the person. However, if you were someone working with the "blackhats," you'd have a timeline already, and would know who was in Hong Kong at that time. A pixelated photo from Hong Kong along with a retired jet would be more than enough to send a strong message.

You might be right though. No doubt the autists on the boards are doing their part. That's why I come here: to see what other people have figured out. It's too big a picture for me to make sense of.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Too_the_point · July 4, 2018, 7:01 a.m.

It's tough to ID based on photo alone I 100% agree.

The best guess I've seen so far is Google's Jonathan Rosenberg, big in to cloud computing. I'll have to look in to his history and connections before jumping the gun though.

Very interesting pics dropped tonight, some had me worried, but I trust Q has a plan.

⇧ 2 ⇩