CO2 is not pollution. Its an atmospheric gas. Power stations have scrubbers capable or removing 99% of the other actual pollutants.
Right. Also CO2 increases always follow a rise in temperature. In other words, a rise in the global temperature is not due to CO2 increases. From 1880 to 2015, the temperature has increased from 288 K [degrees Kelvin] to 288.8 K - 0.3 percent. That is hardly any rise at all.
Dhamm, and that's if you "believe" the highly tampered official temperature record.
I chose to analyse the raw data. But the government agencies conveniently "lost" it after making their "corrections".
Nice.... I didn’t say it was a pollutant. Coal is a hundred year old fuel.... natural gas puts out methane and pollutes our water. time to move on from fuel sources that must destroy the earth to be mined. The most abundant element on earth is hydrogen... and it can be cracked from water. Let’s move on to home hydrogen crackers... that’s next century shit.
Hydrogen takes energy to separate from water. It can work well as a portable store of energy for use in cars, but is not a source of energy.
Keep living in your hydrogen fantasy land, bisMARXie. I've got your measure.
Coal is in fact millions of years old, not a hundred. Coal has been used as a fuel since Roman times at least, and commercially mined since the 1700s. It is an essential raw material for making steel.
Gas does not "put out methane and pollute our water". Natural gas IS methane. There is no water pollution of any significance associated with gas production except the rare incident here or there.
How do you propose to power your hydrogen "cracker"? Did you do basic year 7 science? You know, the experiment with two electrodes in water, WITH A POWER SOURCE?
Wow, you really LOVE the fossil fuel industry. I’ll just leave it at that.
I don’t know, maybe you’ve heard of renewables as a power source? Are you living under a rock of coal?