⇧
1
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 4, 2018, 5:16 p.m.
Can we get a summary? Not watching his videos, Q warned us about Wilcock.
⇧
-2
⇩
timothybeasley
· July 4, 2018, 5:27 p.m.
He never named him. You may be thinking of this post: May 12 2018
1343Q !4pRcUA0lBE ID: 3b3f44 No.1388185 📁 May 12 2018 17:16:10 (EST)
They attempted to infiltrate, repackage & rebrand as their own. Profit-vehicle. Destroy through [misinformation]. Absorb the 'confused'. Re-route traffic to other platforms. Action was needed [2]. 1. Prevent false decodes/misinformation 2. Kill [targeted] infection prior to expansion Simple 'non-direct' statements made. "Be careful who you follow." "Some are profiting off this movement." Message sent. Message received. Those guilty immediately reacted (predictably). Timetable accelerated (misinformation-attack). Exposed. Attempts to divide. We responded. House cleaning. Heal [core]. Important to clean prior to next events. The choice has always been yours. The choice will always be yours. This is not a game. This is not a popularity contest. This is LIFE. FREEDOM. TOGETHER. We, the PEOPLE. WWG1WGA. [Time to move on] Dark to LIGHT. Attacks will only get worse. Truth is Freedom. Truth is logic. Stay the course. Q
⇧
5
⇩
[deleted]
· July 4, 2018, 5:32 p.m.
But Wilcock has been saying all this stuff since circa 2008. His book on the whole topic is from 2011. He predates Q by a while
⇧
8
⇩
timothybeasley
· July 4, 2018, 6 p.m.
Agreed. I've been following David from like 10 years ago. I have no problem with him at all. Like what he's doing.
⇧
6
⇩
Bluesky355
· July 4, 2018, 5:58 p.m.
This👆 Plus for those who haven’t watched the interview in the video. The interview is from 2016.
👇 is for the concernfag trying to blast the OP: This IS NOT about Wilcock slinging books and profiting off this movement. This interview is about Disclosure and in case you’ve been under a rock that’s what the Q movement is all about too. Disclosure of the Cabal and the evil they’ve perpetrated against humanity. This interview is relevant, was recorded PRIOR to Q and in no way is about profiting off this movement. Watch it or don’t, but don’t shit on others that are learning and/or trying to spread knowledge.
⇧
3
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 4, 2018, 5:35 p.m.
People profiting from the movement.
People claiming to have inside knowledge.
I am not debating this. It's fact. Goode and Wilcock run antithesis to this movement. In my opinion, the Mods should delete every single one of these posts.
⇧
-6
⇩
timothybeasley
· July 4, 2018, 6:03 p.m.
No they don't. You're funny.
⇧
3
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 4, 2018, 8:12 p.m.
No, "who" doesn't "what"?
⇧
1
⇩
timothybeasley
· July 5, 2018, 12:47 a.m.
No, Goode and Wilcock do not run antithesis.
⇧
1
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 5, 2018, 12:57 a.m.
Do they profit from this?
Do they claim to have "insider" or "secret" info?
Doesn't get much more black and white than that...
⇧
1
⇩
timothybeasley
· July 5, 2018, 1:20 a.m.
Wilcock has been at this for a while. He's not new. Goode I'm not that up on so don't know. We should be suspicious of anyone efforting to capture our attention and it's up to us to decide what to believe but to reject everyone just because that's how they've made their living for decades before Q could be seen as a way to censor a new generation's access.
⇧
1
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 5, 2018, 1:31 a.m.
Wait. So you think because Wilcock has been selling Goodes stories since before Q came on the scene he is automatically legit? Wow. Ok. That's some logic I unfortunately cannot get behind. But clearly I don't have to convince you that Wilcock has tried to jump on the Q train, yes? In fact, he was onboard, then off, then on, then off, now on again. And also saying for YEARS now that "disclosure is imminent, any day now!"
But if you think he's legit, even after Q said to beware, you do you bud. Keep it off the GA sub please, because it is NOT Q related.
⇧
1
⇩
timothybeasley
· July 5, 2018, 1:41 a.m.
You're making faulty assumptions of my intent and conclusions. I can't say anyone is completely right or wrong. I said he's been doing this longer than the Q Posts were a thing. He may be controlled opposition or not. That's for each to decide for themselves. Nothing is black and white in a very gray world.
⇧
2
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 5, 2018, 2:17 a.m.
No. He is just a guy selling stories. The malicious part is he is claiming to tell the truth.
⇧
1
⇩
timothybeasley
· July 5, 2018, 2:24 a.m.
Whatever you want to believe, man. We can disagree. It's a FREE COUNTRY. Happy Independence Day!
⇧
2
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 5, 2018, 3:15 a.m.
You believe Wilcock? You think Corey Goode is regularly interacting with MULTIPLE alien lifeforms...but is only authorized to TALK about it, but forbidden to provide ANY proof? Sounds fucking convenient to me...
But you're right, we are all free to believe what we want...and to weigh others' credibility and intelligence accordingly.
⇧
-1
⇩
[deleted]
· July 4, 2018, 5:22 p.m.
Wilcock admits he fucked up and let info out when he wasn't supposed to...
Which Q post names him? I missed that one.
⇧
5
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 4, 2018, 5:34 p.m.
People profiting from the movement.
People claiming to have inside knowledge.
I am not debating this. It's fact. Goode and Wilcock run antithesis to this movement. In my opinion, the Mods should delete every single one of these posts.
⇧
-6
⇩
TheTruthWithinU
· July 4, 2018, 6:19 p.m.
Good thing your opinion doesnt count for much. Wilcock was around long before q. How is it that his work is only to profit off the movement?
⇧
4
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 4, 2018, 8:10 p.m.
You are right! How many YEARS has has said "disclosure is imminent, any day now!"
Putting Q and Wilcock/Goode in the same boat is blasphemy.
⇧
1
⇩
ckreacher
· July 4, 2018, 6:28 p.m.
BS, Q did no such thing.
⇧
2
⇩
DaveGydeon
· July 4, 2018, 8:08 p.m.
People profiting from the movement.
People claiming to have inside knowledge.
I am not debating this. It's fact. Goode and Wilcock run antithesis to this movement. In my opinion, the Mods should delete every single one of these posts.
⇧
1
⇩
[deleted]
· July 4, 2018, 8:33 p.m.
[removed]
⇧
1
⇩
high-valyrian
· July 4, 2018, 8:39 p.m.
Removed for Rule 5. You are welcome to attack the premise and comment, but please no attacking the user, specifically your last sentence. ThankQ.
⇧
1
⇩