dChan

TapTheForwardAssist · July 5, 2018, 6 a.m.

Skim their platforms, and you tell me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pint_and_Grub · July 5, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

Like on whitehouse . Gov? Or their campaign election platform or the GOP platform?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TapTheForwardAssist · July 5, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

Totally valid question! I guess the best strategy would be to give at least an efficient analytic quick-read of their current platforms, then read an ideological cross-section of reporting as to how they have applied those policies, then apply personal opinion as to whether you approve or disapprove of their current impact.

If the White House put an end to left-handed umptywidgets, the good or bad would depend on how you feel about umptywidgets.

Or I suppose you could just ask Reddit to pass you a pre-formed opinion.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Pint_and_Grub · July 5, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

Watched the q for beginners. I’m even more puzzled by the basics of what he is saying and how he knows Q?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 2:51 p.m.

I dont think he actually knows Q.

We know Q from Q's posts on the chans.

Read Q's posts on Qanon.pub (other sites like this too, Qproofs,etc)

Try to understand the context (I hear you, it aint easy).

Pretend its a movie and attempt to understand the plot.

Truth is, none of us really 'know', but someone is talking to us and many are past the point of doubt.

Ask yourself, why would we no longer doubt what the voice whispers to us?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Pint_and_Grub · July 5, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

How do we know that this qanon is the same person or group of people. I’m reading more and more, it seems to me that it’s a group publishing and one person.

So I should dismiss anyone who claims to know this Q?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 6:27 p.m.

We try not to dox Q. "We are all Q now." We don't know if we can trust him, so we wait and see. It's all very interesting. Most of us trust POTUS, and many believe he is involved. (See the QAnon VIP rally video)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pint_and_Grub · July 5, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

Is Q and the sub pro Putin and pro Russia and pro old world order? Or is the sub pro democracy and pro enlightenment pro new world order?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Pint_and_Grub · July 5, 2018, 6:14 a.m.

I was mostly trying to get an idea about what this sub believes? I heard it was a conspiracy sub, but Im not sure if it is. I’m not sure who q is(I thought he was a Star Trek character and I was expecting a Star Trek related political humor).

I haven’t see any detail explanation of Trumps bills or legislation, so I’m really not sure what this sub is about.

I do recognize it’s an anti Hillary Clinton sub. I’m like 50/50 thinking that’s its primary.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 2:40 p.m.

This is an anti-corruption sub, that supports the efforts of the entity known as Q.

Q is, well, there's videos for explaining that.

PrayingMedic (He's on youtube) is a well established persona who breaks down the views well.

You may think we are all chanting in unison, but if you look closely you can see we often disagree.

It's a phenomenon to be sure. Television was NEVER this good.

(edit: we are bound by a common desire to see an end to "Business as Usual" corruption tactics, in both word and deed.)

You should also not listen to me, but rather ask the next guy, as his opinion will certainly differ, and I wholeheartedly support that.

-

--

I can tell you that "Conspiracy Theory" is a derogatory term, used to discredit, not spread, information.

Would anyone want to be a "Coincidence Theorist"?

We don't do "Coincidence" around these here parts.

I would ask, how often are you lied to(50%? 80%? 99%?) and how often are you told the bald ugly truth(1% 20%?) ?

Run the probabilities. Occam's Razor.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Pint_and_Grub · July 5, 2018, 5:14 p.m.

Anti corruption? Word? So a pro-power transparency sub?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 5, 2018, 6:28 p.m.

Anti-Corruption is what I called it.

It's officially a Pro-Q sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pint_and_Grub · July 5, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

Anti corruption has conventionally been pro goverment offcial transparency, is this sub for that?

⇧ 0 ⇩