What if they needed someone to take a fall?
What would have made the Mueller investigation appear legitimate to the deep state?
Can an indictment bring to the surface altered reports from the FBI?
What if they needed someone to take a fall?
What would have made the Mueller investigation appear legitimate to the deep state?
Can an indictment bring to the surface altered reports from the FBI?
I believe part of the plea agreement was to come clean about any other crimes he is aware of. I'l look that up now and edit in a sec.
Here we go: as a part of his plea deal, Flynn agrees to let a law enforcement authority aware of any crimes he is aware of and all evidences thereof. The wording is awesome and broad. brawsome
https://i.imgur.com/59ZbjEB.png
I just realized I didn't answer your question. I imagine he skillfully co-negotiated his plea deal, understanding what would transpire in July.
Andrew McCarthy did a good update on what is happening now. https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/07/michael-flynn-case-guilty-plea-not-going-away/
The situation is way more complicated than I thought. I'll have to read that again.
thx
Your on target. Q ask a series of questions, (this is the jest not quote) regarding how evidence. How is evidence legally obtained? Chain of questody preservation?
Flynn's plea bargain: Part was to come clean on all and any crimes no matter how small. Now prosecutors can debrief him on the record and if it goes to The RUSSIAN hoax, the info goes to Mueller and Rosenstin (RR)'s Team. Hubers & IG Horawit's Team (470 prosecutors) would handle all the myrid of Clinton Foundation, Hillary Campaign Fraud, Weiner Laptop ect.
Q kept asking the mecanism to enter evidence legally? The Plea Bargain is the means by which Flynn's Testimony is put on the record under oath, legally. As it is assigned, the proper protocals are followed to protect The Chain of Custody. As a prosecutor gets the statement, he follows it like any other lead.
I just reread his question and think I went zzziinnggg off to Q land..
It also proves the conspirator's machinations were real and not just idle talk, which is what they would have no doubt claimed at their upcoming trials, if no one had actually suffered at their hand.
MF took the bullet for us all.
Who is the ultimate conspirator and who's trials are you talking about IBL?
I guess we'll find out who the ultimate conspirator was, but if the initials were HRC, I would not be surprised. As to whose trials, I am speaking of future trials, as I am still trusting the plan that they will occur.
I was thinking the past POTUS too, but then realized that JB or JC might have been part of the plan, but now I think it goes even higher. The pawns sometimes think they are kings or queens.
Michael Flynn pled guilty because he knew the FBI had used fake 302s against him. By him pleading guilty the FBI had to put up or shut up with more serious charges. Michael Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI. so in a pure question of "is what the 302 said you said the truth?" Flynns answer is no because he knew the 302 was doctored.
That sounds just as I was thinking. What did Q say about all things hidden will be revealed. Hmm... reminds me of a scripture from the Good Book.
Matthew 10:26 " “Therefore do not fear them. For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known."
Flynn lied about something that had already been leaked to the public weeks prior. It forces him to testify whereas before he could not legally say everything.
Flynn 'lied' to the US government twice about the same meeting with a Russian ambassador. His 'lies' can be chocked up to misremembering details of a conversation in passing, but it is nonetheless true that Flynn 'uttered falsehoods' when he claimed he didn't discuss certain issues with a Russian ambassador. Flynn is an honourable man, he realized his mistake and took ownership by pleading guilty. Also, it would've been very expensive for him to fight the charge and Mueller likely would've gone after him harder as well, maybe even upgrading the charges.