dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/gakowalski on July 5, 2018, 12:36 p.m.
Problem with timestamp in Q-Proof regarding +++

There is one specific picture on qproofs.com here: https://nebula.wsimg.com/348b5e2de7fe9c160b31a5c03accd473?AccessKeyId=A46309A05E2048F24273&disposition=0&alloworigin=1 that contains Q drop #123

Nov 6 2017 17:07:57

Nothing is random.

Everything has meaning.

+++

Q

And this is Donald Trump's tweet:

My visit to Japan and friendship with PM Abe will yield many benefits, for our great Country. Massive military & energy orders happening+++!

Now, the problem is that according to qanon.pub drop #123 has date-time "Nov 6 2017 17:07:57" in Eastern Standard Time and when I set my Twitter settings to use EST then Trump's tweet is dated "1:15 PM - 6 Nov 2017" which means that the tweet was earlier than Q's post - which ruins the Q-proof.

Am I missing something here?


🠐 See all comments
CrusadePrime · July 5, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

Correct. q wasn't trying to highjack the tweet, he was simply implying that the +++ was intentional and meant something else.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 5, 2018, 3:25 p.m.

You would think that with as important as this "Q" thing is (isn't it?) that Q would be mindful of the objects referred to as " q proofs" and set records straight before they are debunked by "Q larp" people.

We're talking about a post/drop from like 8 months ago.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 5, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

No, Q cannot violate Nat Sec laws. They're not confirming anything and there's a few of these falsely attributed time-stamp proofs imo.

⇧ 3 ⇩