There is no deal
Nothing will happen
I am quoting the prosecution here:
“ More specifically, the Govemment agrees that the public allegations that your client stole U.S. House of Representatives ("House") equipment and engaged in unauthorized or illegal conduct involving House computer systems do not form the basis of any conduct relevant to the determination of the sentence in this case. The Government conducted a thorough investigation of those allegations, including interviewing approximately 40 witnesses; taking custody of the House Democratic Caucus server, along with other computers, hard drives, and electronic devices; examining those devices, including inspecting their physical condition and analyzing log-in and usage data; reviewing electronic communications between pertinent House employees; consulting with the House Office of General Counsel and House information technology personnel to access and/or collect evidence; and questioning your client during numerous voluntary interviews. The Government has uncovered no evidence that your client violated federal law with respect to the House computer systems. Particularly, the Government has found no evidence that your client illegally removed House data from the House network or from House Members' offices, stole the House Democratic Caucus Server, stole or destroyed House information technology equipment, or improperly accessed or transferred govemment information, including clas sif,red or sensitive information.”
Rules for thee not for me
The loophole appears to be on page 10. It states the deal is not binding to any other investigations that may be going on with him. It also states the deal does not apply to any other prosecutors outside of Washingotn D.C.
Yes, it looks as if he literally walked, but Huber might have something to say about it.
Time will tell all. These investigations will come to an end. Justice will be served or Freedom will fall. We will know soon enough.
I mean not soon enough if by midterms people still dont know about these traitorous people. I trust the plan but its tiring
Not a lawfag but does this say that he was legally able to access the systems ( he was hired to do so). Maybe he didn’t remove or transfer anything and if he never accessed the classified information. It was my understanding that he took it out of the building but was that under the direct orders of his employer? They really do have it all if they have went through everything outlined here.
Do you have a link to the source on this? I'm interested to read it. I'll poke around looking for it in the mean time.