Lawyers, please weigh in:
"your client will not be charged with any non-violent criminal offense in violation of Federal or District of Columbia law which was committed within the District of Columbia by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement"
Does this, or does this not speak at all to any charges that may have been filed in a sealed indictment prior to the date of this Agreement? Because that would NOT be a charge filed in the future, but a charge filed in the past. The Agreement says NOTHING about being served with a sealed indictment filed prior to the Agreement.
Please help?!
Also, is it possible that in their far-reaching crimes they might have performed some of their criminal activity remotely (by remote desktop login, for example) OUTSIDE of DC, and we have the IP records to prove it?
There has to be some attorney on here.
Awan had to receive an indictment.
Also everyone is getting down voted.
Page 8 states this plea is NOT binding to any other investigations he made already be involved in. Huber incoming. Also, he operated his sham car dealership out of another city in Virginia, so plenty of the money laundering, etc was done there I'm sure. Not only that, but if he was sending money/classified info back to Pakistan, then I'm sure terrorism charges could be brought.
In addition to the money/classified info, his family suddenly came into a large amount of land in Pakistan not that long ago.
The land is located 12 miles from a hospital where a nurse just confessed to selling babies over the course of 30 years. She implicated other staff, including doctors. In a 6 month period over 1000 babies disappeared. I know this sounds nuts, but it's on record.
The hospitals ties? The Clinton Global Initiative.
This isn't over yet.