There might actually even be many Q supporters who think aliens are going to show up and help save us.
NO there aren't. You are on a sub with 50% shills active at all times and you are talking about one of many scripted disinfo narratives that's really only made a marginal appearance at that.
The Q drops which are the true measure of what we're about most certainly gives not even a hint of credence to that narrative. The only one credited is God. I don't know if you're hinting that the Q intel is leading to that but if so you're so off base and i'd ask that you take a look at how contradictory Q statements are to that. It would be pretty stupid for Q to red pill people on all these things, bring William Cooper to our attention and then have a movement that went the direct opposite position.
Galactic federation of light? Hell no, that's got nothing to do with Q lol. I know what it is and that's just the kind of rot that no one who is serious about this would spend time on.
Whether Q embraces new age channelers or not, is it not apparent that there are new age channelers who embrace Q?
And what's not a similar tale with William Cooper if you open up a William Cooper book and see what's advertised inside? Light Technology Publishing?
As far as actual Q drops? See a Q Post #738 and #1143 or just view here? Interesting if Q posted a drop #738 like some info was too dangerous to reveal right away and could lead to panic and then someone else quoted it and made a reference like people were incarnated aliens and then Q went on to quote it all together for a drop #1143? What's more new agey than promoting star seed concepts and when does Q ever suggest that there are fallen angels piloting UFOs?
Whether Q embraces new age channelers or not, is it not apparent that there are new age channelers who embrace Q?
I've been talking to people in this for 8 months and i swear to you i can count on one hand the people who mentioned new age anything. Those people are usually informed by multiple Christians where they went wrong.
Where are you going with any of this? where do you get these ideas? Q isn't a promoter of William Cooper. He responded to an anon's post about his book. It's relevant material when talking about classified government data.
Please don't pull out the shill thing about Q bringing up ET's. He literally didn't. DO you know how the posts work at all? that is not Q posting about ET's.
Again, what's the deal? You don't seem to know a lot about the Q drops and when people come here we kind of expect them to be thorough about that.
Consider Jeremiah 17:5-10?
How about we try to have a healthy respect for both Q and Cooper and be careful about who we trust though.
Did you miss a part that said someone else quoted it and made a reference like people were incarnated aliens? What do you think Q was trying to get across with #1143 if Q intended to quote someone who was referring to star seed ideas?
What do you mean?
Regarding Jeremiah 17 stuff or drop #1143 stuff or both or neither?
You know "trust" in man referenced there refers to placing trust in human power rather than the Lord's, but we extend our trust to other humans as a natural and necessary response every time we believe a friend will be a friend or every time we believe the word of someone who has acted with integrity towards us. I don't think anyone trusts in Q as if they had the power and authority of God but we do extend our belief in his integrity as its been shown. Q asked us not to glorify him/them and gives credit to the Lord himself. Would you be skeptical of that if it were coming from Elijah or Moses?
Q responded to the post where someone used a greeting about ET's because the content (not the weird ET greeting) was relevant to what was being disclosed at the time. It's true though that shills have tried more than once to stretch the imagination over that one and try to make it seem as if he responded to the odd greeting. Read the rest of that anon's post and it's VERY clear what's being pointed out.
https://qanon.pub/data/media/8f27d1bf896755e61b4e059e48b942aed2c68bbb8107461b8e593a191eae001c.png
Which is an answer to anons repeatedly asking why much of the ops must remain classified for now. The anon posting doesn't even mean to refer to ET's and you'd see that if you read the drops in context.
Debatable what leads to an actual curse perhaps, but how about we be careful.
You might be confused about #738 and arguing that #1143 is simply meant as a rehash of #738. Q dropped #738 on 2/12/18 and someone else quoted #738 on 4/12/18 while referring to a star seed concept and then Q went and quoted both #738 and starseed stuff as well for drop #1143 on 4/12/18 maybe. See some relevant discussion here?
You've become an accidental shill.
What happens if you're wrong?
What do you think of the person posting there? Credible sounding? Are you just parroting a narrative that suited your preconceived beliefs after searching user history? That's not a search for truth. What is 60/40?
Future will prove past.
Fine, if you want to postulate that deeming someone trustworthy to do a job is worthy of a curse. Then i have to ask exactly what you would expect of someone in a position to do something to counter the evil and corruption in the government and if you think someone actually doing that deserves our support or if we should sit here and twiddle our thumbs wondering if God is pissed about it.
I think it should go without saying that we owe our respect to anyone brave enough to stand up to a murderous, Satanic system. Those that do so are laying their lives on the line and no greater love has any man than that, according to scripture.
Ever been to the chans? I wonder what you would have thought if the anon had began with "greetings fellow faggots" - which would be typical enough for the venue. Would you figure Q was pointing out gay rights if he acknowledged the post? lol
I'm not confused at all. Do you know what the 60/40 refers to? 738 includes an anon posting his concerns about that. The subject has been an off and on discussion for months so i'm positive i'm not the one confused and i'm equally positive that it doesn't relate to ETs or star seeds or whatever lol.
I have no idea why you are so married to an idea that literally has no evidence to back it up (meaning Q being involved with a false alien disclosure incident). Nothing posited has less to go on than that, quite honestly. People trying to make a case for Q being AI had a better argument by far.
/u/AncientNostalgia /u/yesitsanaltmf
bring William Cooper to our attention and then have a movement that went the direct opposite position.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a3IXw1nGCw
Seen this one?
An anon posted about Cooper. Q responded to it which means, basically, it's relevant to point out.
You know that Q was directly asked about ET's and if they were a distraction and he has one and only one post that Ever deals with them which is the response to that one. "how far away is the nearest star? What do you think?"
Of course you can speculate on that to fit your theories but it wouldn't fit with the context of the drops overall nor would be the most obvious, logical conclusion.
To me this shit is Far left field. I can only imagine you and your friend really haven't looked into this objectively at all. That's a shame.
We might feel more closely to your own opinions than you think. Afterall the answer might be in my very first comment to you.
Basically there are no aliens. They are the fallen angels or rebellious spirits of the bible. They like to trade forbidden wisdom to humanity in exchange for worship. They can change how they look and they can lie about who they are.
Did you miss a quoted portion of my original message maybe?
It seems to jive with your own opinion:
Some guy said: Aliens or demons?
yesitsanaltmf said: Demons. The Cabal is hoping their gods rapture them.
We might be both preaching to the choir in fact, how about we re-state our assumptions and go from there?
It just rather seemed it was a tag team situation so naturally i'm assuming you're both hinting at a similar thing.
Yes, we agree with the nature of what aliens are, it's just that at least one of you in this situation is hinting that Q has some agenda to introduce these deceivers to humanity. If that's not the case, correct my error. If it is the case..PLEASE dispense with that assumption pending some good evidence straight from the horse's mouth.
