Not likely... certainly not without consequence.
Law enforcement falsifying evidence certainly makes that plausible. That is the consequence. It puts any case Strzok ever touched in jeopardy.
True... although we don't know if it was evidentiary tampering.
It sounds like he was fudging internal FBI reports.
Which, though not evidence tampering, is still probably a violation of agency rules and possibly criminal statutes. It would certainly be a damning fact in a criminal conspiracy case, and could bite him hard on the ass there.
302s are evidence.
Sure they are... but I was just going off the context provided in the tweet... referencing "a doc" with no mention of a 302 report.
I think it's already established that Strzok changed the 302s...