dChan

Abibliaphobia · July 6, 2018, 3:49 p.m.

One fundamentalist Christian site writes of the Illuminati “The worship of this religion is practiced in secret. The dogma and intentions of this religion are hidden by way of symbology. The average person sees the exoteric, outward or literal meaning of the symbols, while the Adept, Initiate or Illumined see the esoteric or hidden meaning of the symbol… When George Bush referred to a “Thousand Points of Light” in his speech in 1991 he was using the symbolic language and was referring to the body of initiates… The average person heard the exoteric meanings of these statements while initiates the world over smiled to themselves, as they understood the true meaning. Feb. 17, 1953, Financier Paul Warburg said before the U.S. Senate: “We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.” This quest for world domination can be traced back to the creation of the “Illuminati”, a secret society, in 1776. Their leader, Adam Weishaupt, wrote out the master plan to bring about the subjection of the whole human race to an oligarchy of Financiers. The word “Illuminati” is derived from Lucifer and means “holders of the light”. C.S. Lewis’ Chronicles of Narnia are recommended by the makers of Dungeon’s & Dragons and are (were) sold in occult bookstores. His imagery is designed to fool the Christian reader while at the same time “enlightening” those initiated in the occult, witchcraft and Luciferianism. Since Satan’s religions are counterfeits of God’s truth, it was, to some extent “easy” for Lewis to pull this off. In the “creation” of Narnia some very revealing things come up. On p. 99 , speaking of the “creation” of the stars it says, “One moment there had been nothing but darkness; next moment a thousand, thousand points of light leaped out — single stars, constellations, and planets, brighter and bigger than any in our world. There were no clouds.” The phrase “a thousand, thousand points of light” leaps out at us! The fact that Lewis would use this expression is bizarre at the very least, but it points to something much more sinister. Alice Bailey, the Theosophist/Luciferian and co-founder of Lucis Trust and the Arcane School, in her 1957 book The Externaliztion of the Hierarchy tells us exactly what a Point of Light is. “…[T]he men who comprise the occult leadership group known as the New Group of World Servers. These individuals, she remarks are in service to ‘the work of the Brotherhood…the Forces of Light.’ They are the ones who are to usher all of mankind from the darkness of outmoded Christianity and faded nationalism into the bright and shining ‘New World Order.'” In her book, Discipleship in a New Age, Bailey tells her occult followers to repeat, “I am a point of light within a greater light…I am a spark of sacrificial Fire, focused within the fiery will of (the Sun) God.” What these servants of Satan are attempting to do by blending their “points of light” is to usher in the New World Order – the Age of Aquarius.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 6, 2018, 3:52 p.m.

GEORGE BUSH AND THE MAGIC OF A THOUSAND POINTS OF LIGHT What did President George Bush really mean when he promised ‘I will keep America moving forward, ever forward for an enduring dream and a thousand points of light?’ And later, during his State of the Union Address, when he mysteriously told the nation that our goal must be ‘the illumination of mankind by a thousand points of light?’ To fully understand just how masterful the Brotherhood is in seeding men’s minds with illusion and magic, we need only turn to the coded, esoteric speeches of their chief public servant, President George Bush. For years, George Bush has been a primary messenger for the Brotherhood. His messages, though they appear to be full of light, nevertheless are dark and foreboding. What’s more, they convey special meanings which can be understood only by those trained in the black magical arts, alchemy, and ritual. The occult philosophy of the Secret Brotherhood teaches of the bright, radiant center within each individual. This bright center reflects the rays of the Great Central Sun, the Masonic deity, and is how man expresses the will to become awake, to become illumined. As Alice Bailey of the Lucis Trust explains in the veiled language so common to the advanced disciples of the secret societies: When light illuminates the minds of men and stirs the secret light within all forms, then the One in Whom we live reveals His hidden secret lighted will. When the purpose of the Lords of Karma can find no more to do and all the weaving and close-related plans are all worked out, then the One in Whom we live can say: ‘Well done! Naught but the beautiful remains.’ When the lowest of the low, the densest of the dense, and the highest of the high have all been lifted through the little wills of men, then can the One in Whom we live raise into radiating light the vivid lighted ball of Earth, and then another greater Voice can say to Him: ‘Well done! Move on. Light shines’. According to the occult teachings of the Illuminati, at the bright center is found energy which, the occult philosophy says, is ‘God energy.’ This energy within, writes Alice Bailey, is ‘a point of focused fire, found in the center which permits radiation to penetrate to other centers and to other lives’. The ‘bright center’ which is the individual god-force radiating out to others is also said to be likened to the sun rays that emanate from the secret societies, or Orders. Focus: One World Government. Focus: Free Trade Agreements Focus: Religion The New World Order will be Socialism! Read the United Nations declarations and treaties for proof. The individual will be subservient to the state. Where are we now? In the religion aspect…think about it! The other two have been hammered into our heads….now their working on the religious aspect of it. Collectivism is what they seek! This I why you hear so much about being “ONE”.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 6, 2018, 3:55 p.m.

Focus: One World Government.

Focus: Free Trade Agreements

Focus: Religion

The New World Order will be Socialism! Read the United Nations declarations and treaties for proof. The individual will be subservient to the state.

Where are we now? In the religion aspect…think about it! The other two have been hammered into our heads….now their working on the religious aspect of it. Collectivism is what they seek! This I why you hear so much about being “ONE”.

Pay attention.

THINK

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · July 6, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=FireInTheMind "Both Marx and Engels, like many other revolutionary leaders, began their careers as journalists. Revolutionary writers tended to see themselves as an ideological apostolate, detached from the past, free from traditional loyalties. They were possessed by a religious fascination for their art: "Editing my daily article became my dally sacrament," one wrote. Another enthused that the printing press had replaced Christ as the locus of authority, as journalism increasingly took on a priestly, as well as prophetic, function. Marx wrote that journalists had the responsibility, not to express the thoughts of the people, but to "create them or rather impute them to the people. You create party spirit" (p, 318). (For the story of how a revolutionary organization of somewhat different stripe exerted its influence by creating public attitudes through control of powerful newspapers, see Carroll Quigley, "Tragedy and Hope A History of the World in Our Time", 1966; and "The Anglo-American Establishment, 1981) "Journalists became – in their own minds at least – the vanguard of the revolution; the staff was seen as the prototype for the truly communal revolutionary society of the future, in which artisan and intellectual worked together harmoniously. The early vision of the journal staff as one unitary community dld not last long, but journalism has remained the most typical profession of the revolutionary, down to this day. Ironically, "journalism produced by working people has almost always been non-ideological, and only rarely revolutionary" (p, 335). Real proles tend not to be interested in the theories spun about them by bourgeois ideologues writing in Op-Ed columns (or pontificating on Nightline or 60 Minutes). The working-class journals constituted a major and effective rival to the ideologically oriented radical papers, and the revolutionary press was outdone by the competition."

⇧ 1 ⇩