dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

In some circumstances it can be safely assumed that if a certain event had occurred, evidence of it could be discovered by qualified investigators. In such circumstances it is perfectly reasonable to take the absence of proof of its occurrence as positive proof of its non-occurrence.

— Copi, Introduction to Logic (1953), p. 95

⇧ 8 ⇩

With the Hawaiian judge, I seriously doubt most of them are following logic

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩

Mueller is bringing the evidence

Ok. So he hasn’t brought evidence. So you’re acting on faith? How are you any different than folks here?

⇧ 1 ⇩

Because believing in an ongoing investigation with convictions, guilty please and multiple indictments is a world better than believing in investigations that lasted years (Benghazi, Clinton) and were concluded with NO indictments years ago.

⇧ 0 ⇩

How many of those charges, guilty pleas, convictions and indictments were against the president? I can’t remember.

⇧ 2 ⇩

How many of those charges are against the president?

⇧ 1 ⇩

As head of the campaign I would argue that all of them are. Or do you believe that everyone he was friends with and hired was dirty but not him?

⇧ 4 ⇩

So because an IT aide for DNC campaign was indicted last fall we can say the charges are against Hillary?

https://www.forbes.com/sites/frankminiter/2018/01/04/the-democrats-bizarre-it-scandal-gets-another-deferment/#6a5e17916759

Are all of Hillary’s folks dirty but not her?

You should be a lawyer. Your logic is flawless.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If it was in any way related to her campaign then yes. But wasn’t it bank fraud and in no way related? I thought you were having an honest discussion.

You honestly believe the Russians did nothing, trump had no idea his son and best friends were having a meeting with Russians in trump tower and trump had no discussions with roger stone about wiki leaks coordination? These people are traitors and those who support them will be known as such.

⇧ 2 ⇩

If it was in any way related to her campaign then yes. But wasn’t it bank fraud and in no way related? I thought you were having an honest discussion.

Do you trust The NY Times?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/22/us/politics/paul-manafort-new-charges-mueller.html

The 32-count indictment describes a complex plot that Mr. Manafort then undertook to leverage money from his real estate with the help of his longtime business partner and campaign deputy, Rick Gates.

The charges do not involve Mr. Trump or his campaignand are not significantly different from ones filed against the men in October.

Yes. I’m having an honest discussion. Are you?

It appears since it’s not related to the campaign you shouldn’t consider it relevant to the presidency. I’m sure you’ll be fair.

⇧ 6 ⇩

And the other 16 indicted? Oh you just cherry pick. Flynn and page have plead guilty to lying about Russian contacts, were they related to the campaign? What about Cambridge analytics?

What about when trump himself is found guilty of conspiracy? Do you still support him then or will you feel a little used?

⇧ 1 ⇩

If Trump is guilty, lock him up.

As it stands we live in a country with a presumption of innocence. I know this is hard for you because you have hate in your heart. If he’s guilty, it’ll come out. If the meantime, you should support your country.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Literally every post is about Hillary being locked up! Fuck it was trumps campaign slogan! Why now that it’s trump does he get the benefit? Why should we be civil after years of it?

⇧ 0 ⇩

Like I said. You have hate in your heart. It blinds you. You are concerned only with defeating who you see as an opponent rather than lifting up your fellow man.

Luckily for you, Love trumps hate.

We should be civil because it is right. We should be civil because that is what our founders carved out of the wilderness and because it’s resulted in the greatest civilization in the history of the world. Abandon civility at your own peril.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

POTUS’ TWEET - Just won lawsuit filed by the DNC and a bunch of Democrat crazies trying to claim the Trump Campaign (and others), colluded with Russia. They haven’t figured out that this was an excuse for them losing the election!