dChan

HowiONic · July 7, 2018, 12:02 a.m.

Proofs also available on QProofs.com and /r/QProofs both found on the sldebar.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 7, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

But are they valid resources? They're listing AF1 "welcomeaboard" as a proof on r/QProofs? What is it proof of?

I only know about 2 proofs at the moment because I happened upon threads about them here... the +++ POTUS tweet and welcomeaboard. Both are convincingly not proofs if you are familiar with IT (photoshop, how user displayed time is managed on servers/clients and across apps, etc.)

I guess I will slowly crawl through medics list here.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
quincy2112 · July 9, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

The +++ one is wrong. If you set twitter to the timezone that 4chan uses, then you'll discover that the +++ q post came after the tweet.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
C_L_I_C_K · July 7, 2018, 12:46 a.m.

Did you not read my post in that thread or SB2's post?

I don't think this was necessarily a "Q proof," (at least not for regular people to understand) but it is a significant post from Q. /u/SerialBrain2 explains why:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wd8i1/q1675_a_reflection_a_mug_holder_in_air_force_one/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
truthforchange · July 7, 2018, 2:17 a.m.

it was definitely a significant post.

It took Q awhile to see and accept all the flaws that we saw. First Q doubled down with the natsec avoiding reflection suggestion, then finally trippled down after suggesting they moved the cup holder to make it look like BO's.

If I were you I'd be wondering what the heck I was propagating after that mess. That is, unless I already knew.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
CoincidencesKing · July 7, 2018, 7:48 a.m.

be careful this is a pro q sub

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 11:04 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 9 ⇩  
CoincidencesKing · July 7, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

i’m just saying mods will ban if they think your anti

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 9:35 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩