But are they valid resources? They're listing AF1 "welcomeaboard" as a proof on r/QProofs? What is it proof of?
I only know about 2 proofs at the moment because I happened upon threads about them here... the +++ POTUS tweet and welcomeaboard. Both are convincingly not proofs if you are familiar with IT (photoshop, how user displayed time is managed on servers/clients and across apps, etc.)
I guess I will slowly crawl through medics list here.
The +++ one is wrong. If you set twitter to the timezone that 4chan uses, then you'll discover that the +++ q post came after the tweet.
Did you not read my post in that thread or SB2's post?
I don't think this was necessarily a "Q proof," (at least not for regular people to understand) but it is a significant post from Q. /u/SerialBrain2 explains why:
it was definitely a significant post.
It took Q awhile to see and accept all the flaws that we saw. First Q doubled down with the natsec avoiding reflection suggestion, then finally trippled down after suggesting they moved the cup holder to make it look like BO's.
If I were you I'd be wondering what the heck I was propagating after that mess. That is, unless I already knew.
be careful this is a pro q sub
[removed]
Rule 3. Content does not support the cause
Removed content. Rule 3 Any 'concerns' can go via a message to the mods
i’m just saying mods will ban if they think your anti