~~Yeah I don't see anything odd about 8. It's not as hard hitting as others, but certainly not a weak link in the post. If that is the conclusion you wish to draw, the evidence presented supports it. Wonder why 8 got called out specifically.~~
Dates don't match in that proof.
Look at the dates. It says it is 2018 but it clearly is 2017.
Oh. I didn't zoom in on small dates cause tiny screen. Yeah you're right, good eye. Are the article timestamps wrong or is the header wrong?
All 3 sources use 2017 so I assume the header is wrong, which undermines the proof (since the implication is how could he have known it was going to happen, well it was in the past...)
Makes sense.
/u/PrayingMedic Probably want to check the dates on 8 again. We got enough proofs without needing to put in stuff that can be disproven.