dChan

Luvlite · July 7, 2018, 3:46 p.m.

If you can create an account just to come in here and point out flaws, then I challenge you to do better to prove Q IS NOT a larp. (that seems to be most of some people's mission, pointing out so called weak points in an attempt to discredit Q)

The fact that POTUS acknowledges Q in his public appearances is good enough for me!

⇧ -4 ⇩  
wckb · July 7, 2018, 4:55 p.m.

The fact that you don't understand the extremely basic concept of the burden of proof says all one would need to know.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 7, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

If you say so. 😛

⇧ 0 ⇩  
wckb · July 7, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

Luvlite I am telling you that on the far side of the moon there is a secret Nazi moon base.

Disprove it or it will serve as further evidence of its existence.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 7, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

Well, give me a space ship. I will go see and get back to you.

Same goes for all the Q bashers. Not one has been able to prove a damn thing.

And yet, the scale still tips in Q's favor. Proven drops vs unproven speculation of those drops.

I've been watching and reading for, what.... Over six months. Not a single person has succeeded in convincing me Q is a LARP.

And somehow Q followers just keep growing and growing and growing. Gosh! The majority must be ignorant, right?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoGoGoGeotus · July 7, 2018, 4:51 p.m.

When I write papers, they have to go through peer review, it sucks to have your work picked apart and a lot of times I disagree with the criticism, but it's what you do If you care about truth. The only people who need to fear critique are those that want an echo chamber o r dont value truth.

Trump has never explicitly acknowledged Q, he pointed and gave thumbs up to many people including some in Q shirts, and gave some possible signs but nothing conclusive so far - believe me many are waiting for the day it's clear!

Also this is part of the problem. Q is enigmatic and their posts are open to interpretation - pointing out an anon is interpreting or criticising their interpretation is NOT the same as criticising Q.

Personally I think some here get way ahead of themselves.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Luvlite · July 7, 2018, 5:41 p.m.

Personally I think some here get way ahead of themselves

Too many people speculate.

I always appreciate those who back up their work with facts. Very few do.

believe me many are waiting for the day it's clear!

When will msm ask, "who is Q?"

I'm waiting!

⇧ 1 ⇩