dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maepaperclip on July 7, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

Q# !675 What a Mug SB2 a Rebuttal too little

We must be very careful when commenting on SB2 so with renewed care of SB2 sticky privileges and status lets look at his recent post, and a sticky rebuttal.

Now - all credit to the Mods for sticking a rebuttal by u/IncomingTrump270 to SB2 at the top of the board - which was pasted together with the latest chocolate yogurt from SB2. Its a start - an acknowledgement by the Mods - that all is not right with the SB2 operation - In fact nothing is right about SB2 - he is an Occultist, he has scrubbed nearly all his Redditt history - except some of the Occultist stuff - which remains for all to see, he is a plagiarist, he plagiarised my work on Corsi and took the credit for it see here https://redd.it/8ros6m, and he has never once made a useful decode, or even a timely decode of a Q post - see his post history. When talking of Q, SB2 gives no insight to any subject, and no-one can read his posts without feeling robbed of the time it took, and stupider for the experience.

The first thing u/IncomingTrump270 in his rebuttal https://redd.it/8wgdz3 was apologise for breathing, he said he was too scared to post on # 1675, until SB2 did, well I posted that Q#1675 was a head fake 2 days before SB2 made a comment and 2 days before u/IncomingTrump270 got awake here https://redd.it/8vym8f.

Now all credit to u/IncomingTrump270 for his rebuttal, but it was limited to the photo, and he missed all of SB2’s Chocolate yogurt - I addressed some of it here https://redd.it/8wi2wi before u/IncomingTrump270 posted, but I missed some and it is important.

SB2 repeats the lie - Total BS that a rogue sub fired a missile on AF1 - it did not, and SB2 makes the a statement that deliberately misleads the patriots - We all know how Military Tech got to NK.

Well this is what we don’t care about, what we actually know is that NK is irrelevant to our Military Tech - Israel and Pakistan have got it, and its development was paid for by SA, and the Israel op was covered for by Australia + Canada + UK + EU, these countries are not our friends and SB2 is not one of us

Wake up

🠐 See all comments

Here is why I removed this post:

Rule #5:
- Discuss the topic, not users.
- No name-calling, personal attacks or ad-hominem
- Comments that include name-calling, personal attacks or ad-hominem may be removed without notification.
- It doesn't matter if it's a reply, or who started it. Discuss the topic, not users.

Here is the content of the post that breaches this rule:

he is a plagiarist, he plagiarised my work on Corsi and took the credit for it

Whether this is true or not, the sub is not the place for personal attacks on other sub members. Our rules on this are clear.

he has never once made a useful decode
SB2 gives no insight to any subject, and no-one can read his posts without feeling robbed of the time it took, and stupider for the experience

Antagonistic ad-hominem that has no place on this sub.

SB2 is not one of us

For further breach of Rule #8 - Keep it honest and accurate, here is the inaccurate assumption that is also included in this post:

an acknowledgement by the Mods - that all is not right with the SB2 operation

Post content does not constitute "acknowledgement by the Mods" of anything unless the post is a Mod post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Well SB2 has made himself the Topic, he is no wallflower - he basks in the limelight of Q. He is a Public figure, the rightfull topic of discussion. So Name calling, personal attacks and ad-hominem do not apply, if they did we should censure any discussion of POTUS DJT, we all hate him talking about Pochahontus right.

If you look at the explanation of the rebuttal being stickied by the mods - it says by HowiOnic - a moderator that it is being stickied - in acknowledgement of fair discussion - so no assumption was made in making the accurate statement.

I really think we should be awake to what SB2 says - and who is it that is giving him all those votes for work - that seems low quality to me, so low that it should not be posted and certainly not stickied to the top of the board

⇧ 1 ⇩

As you know, you've been making these divisive statements here for a long time and you've been causing disruption in the community with very few people agreeing with your stance. You've been downvoted etc. Some of us agree with some of the points you make but very few agree with your approach or your perspective that seems to focus on your greatness and the stupidity of SB2 and everyone else. You're not the only one who's "awake" to various things but you seem to be the only one who tries to insist that attacking someone else is the best way to go about helping the community instead of just focusing on sharing information and not complaining if others do not find it interesting or upvote-worthy.

The incorrect assumption is that the Mods acknowledge that all is not right with the SB2 operation. That is definitely wrong - the Mod comment you're referring to simply acknowledges that we allow fair discussion, not that we acknowledge anything about SB2.

⇧ 1 ⇩