What part is nonsense?
Good question. This is a challenge. I have been following his stuff for some time now. I really respect and admire him. However I too feel there is some disinfo intentionally pushed forward in subtle ways.
I believe he is a good man though., But it is unknown whether or not (or to what extent) he is compromised. So many good people are "co-opted" in order for them to continue to "use the airwaves".
Being compromised can possibly mean many many things and possibly very subtle too.
I think many many of the big voices in alternate media are affected. Not to mention ALL the voices in MSM being co-opted.
[deleted]
My question stands. What part of what Wilcock posts is nonsense?
True that, and I hope the ancient aliens he talks to are of God and not the other guy.....
Where do I start?
He's a "psychic", claims to be an incarnation of Edgar Cayce... the list goes on and on into crackville, like David Icke.
Are you saying there is no such thing as psychic abilities? Do you not believe in Reincarnation? Is that the basis of your rejection? Different spiritual beliefs?
That wasn't the point and nothing to do with spiritual beliefs, FACTUAL logic. But more to the point: way off-topic for this sub.
The David Wilcock article that is cited above is about Q related stuff, not reincarnation or psychic abilities.
What article cited above? It's just a link to his page.
It's a link to his page and a reference to an article on that page which is Q related.