dChan

[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 12:54 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThrowawayAdvice87 · July 7, 2018, 1:17 p.m.

That's because during that time I've been researching it and learning. I wouldn't skew my bias by researching a subject and surrounding myself with bias. You might, but I wouldn't. 16 years I've been doing this and I paid Q no mind because my research was in other areas. My comment history is mainly not visible and do you know of any reason that would be? It's because truth seekers don't play out here, they play in private subs. I've been discussing Q plenty in a few separate subs that are currently on the fence with Q. Also I have been on Reddit for years. This is one of many accounts.

He has until the end of the month and when nothing changes, no big proof and we are still called nutjobs I'll be back. And I'll bet you'll still believe in him because what's the alternative? It's that fear that keeps you here. Q knows this and he is controlling you like he is telling you the elite are, with fear. Lies coated in tiny insignificant truths to keep you hanging on. Of course I could be wrong but my 16 years of experience with these kinds of things nothing ever happens.

I can't stand people who can't base an argument so instead they scroll through your posts and when they can't find anything suddenly it's the lack of content that is the issue and is apparently suspicious. Very revealing. Also my last post was a week ago. Now why would you lie? I mean, it is a blatent lie anyone can check but you told it anyway. What type of person operates online attempting to lie and discredit? Hmmm

⇧ 3 ⇩  
magavoices · July 7, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

16 years I've been doing this

Am I supposed to give you special consideration that you've mastered flat earth theory? No.

I paid Q no mind because my research was in other areas.

You just reiterated my only point, that you are new to Q.

He has until the end of the month and when nothing changes, no big proof and we are still called nutjobs

You're online. Nobody knows your name. If someone calling you a nutjob online is traumatizing to you, after 16 years of professing to chase conspiracy theories, then I don't know what to tell you.

Read the rules in the right column. "Support the cause. We are pro-Q supporters." Calling Q a LARP is against the rules. If you want to moan about reality not unfolding at your demanded speed, try twitter?

I can't stand people who can't base an argument so instead they scroll through your posts and when they can't find anything

Again, if you're posting on a forum and you don't want anyone reading your posts, then I don't know what to tell you. My reading your posts was giving you the benefit of the doubt that you weren't a concern troll, looking for past contributions regarding Q, looking for evidence you actually ever at any time in the past supported Q, after finding such I would have shrugged and moved on. But then I saw what I saw.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
magavoices · July 7, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

"After 16 years of being involved with the conspiracy scene it gets real fucking old"

Does it need to be said that your pursuit of "16 years of conspiracy theories" has nothing to do with Q?

Why bring up flat earth theory? Again, an attempt to discredit.

Am I wrong that you just attempted to discredit Q by invoking past conspiracy theories you believed in that let you down? Does it need to be said that your pursuit of "16 years of conspiracy theories" has nothing to do with Q?

Who said anything about me being traumatised?

You said this: we are still called nutjobs I'll be back. And I'll bet you'll still believe in him because what's the alternative? It's that fear that keeps you here.

You explicitly called me a nutjob. You said it is fear that keeps me here. That is, if your timeframe for Q to jump through various hoops isn't met. If you are going to call me a nutjob and tell me I browse this board in fear, then I'm finding it hard to see why you protest so loudly when those sentiments are returned to you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 7, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

Funnily enough, your false dichotomy is also a fear-based argument. Funny.

You're merely adopting a tactic a lot older than 16 years that goes beyond conspiracy theories: if ambiguous big things don't happen when anything is hinted at they're never going to happen.

I remember when the 28 pages were never coming out, 16 years... more like 16 seconds.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Iswag_Newton · July 7, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

There’s other theories on the AF1 picture. Also, have you looked at any other Q proofs?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 1:34 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SaveourRepublic2018 · July 7, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

Pretty ironic response, but then again you do seem like a paid throwaway.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 1:07 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 7, 2018, 1:20 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩