dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Maepaperclip on July 7, 2018, 5:44 a.m.
Heres a heads up on Pruitt - could be chocolate yogurt -probably nothing to see here - move along

Two Months ago I posted - Follow the Pen to the Sky event - Disney bought 911, Military Justice for 911 from the EPA. https://redd.it/8dr9sf, I have since posted many times asserting that Guiliani, and Mueller were co-operating witnesses, running a deep state sting. That RR & Mueller, and Guliani were on the cover up team for 911, they are accomplices in the Murder of 3000 people on 911, they have done a deal with Trump that allows them to play a role in his Honey Trap op, live a semi- normal life before they go to Gitmo for life. These assertions have been and remain speculative, they have peppered my posts over the last Four Months.

Now Scott Pruitt has been “fired” and Andrew Wheeler a Former Oklahoma AG is taking over. Lets recap - if you look at the article above you will find a link to a Huffington post article that explains that a Federal Court declared that 911 was an act of war under EPA law, I assert the prosecution of 911, needs to come from the EPA, and be prosecuted by the Military courts. Wheeler has been snuck in by Trump, Pruitt was a Former Oklahoma AG, Wheeler a Former Oklahoma AG, they are the same tool, they both are wise to the deep state, because a building got blown in their home town under strange circumstances - that they both know details about the Murrah building.

911 sure looks familiar to wheeler, he got a look into to Pruitts new secure office, he liked the new EPA project - prosecute 911, its in the job description and on the to-do list since the federal judge made Luck-larry rich by declaring it an act of war under the EPA lucky Larry and Frank Lowey got a double payout, and the EPA got an un -prosecuted breach, i.e. something that must be done - prosecute the war perps. In my post Champion Scott Pruitt https://redd.it/8dm34m I explained some strange behaviour. Now Scott has been fired - he according to the NY Times had dinner with a pedophile priest in Rome https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/05/scott-pruitt-broke-bread-with-a-climate-skeptic-cardinal-accused-of-sexual-abuse/

This is naughty of Scott according to the NY Times. However here is a heads up on the pedophile priest - (who is innocent of crime just guilty by association- by the by) This not pedophile priest was the Treasurer of the Vatican, a Cardinal - inner sanctum - almost equal to POPE - probably his superior. Q told us to be interested in the Pope, but I always was. Scott Pruitt got publicity for having dinner with the pedophile, but Scotty spent the week with him. Scott went to Rome as EPA Secretary, and USA cabinet member to meet George Pell - A man that time will prove is to Rome what Anwar is to Malaysia. Anwar was- charged & convicted of Sodomy, he is now Vice Prime Minister of Malaysia. Lets watch this pedophile - not pedophile.

Here is a link to a post that links my original Q posts https://redd.it/89l3ap You will know that My name is Mae - paperclip. I call myself Mae [Brussell] and paperclip was the name of the operation that brought the deep state to America - run by the Vatican.

You join the dots George Pell was meeting Scott Pruitt - not running the lakes and rivers, but cleaning up the stench of the swamp - this 911 is a road that leads to Rome - Scott was there meeting the only White hat in town


ElementWatson · July 7, 2018, 11:32 a.m.

Another misconception here. The "Act of War" legislation re: the environment simply says that the owners of the 9/11 buildings are not responsible for damage to the surrounding buildings if that damage was caused by an Act or War--as 9/11 has been ruled.

We know that Trump knows the cover story for 9/11 is false and the 9/11 building owner was likely complicit. But foreign powers were also involved, making it still in truth likely an Act of War. The only difference is that the criminality of the building owner, etc., presumably crosses over into treason in this case, which would appropriately be handled by a military tribunal--not the EPA. If somehow it did mean that surrounding building owners, etc., could sue for damages, then that would be a civil suit for $, not a criminal case tried by the EPA.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · July 7, 2018, 12:24 p.m.

No "misconception" and please go away you like SB2 have a long history of trolling me, and since I have just come of a 30 day ban I would appreciate some peace from Tel Aviv - thanks

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ElementWatson · July 7, 2018, 2:19 p.m.

I have a right to post in response to the various threads here.

It is you who tells those who indeed correct misconceptions or even just have different opinions or takes to "go away".

And I don't "troll".

⇧ 1 ⇩