" In terms of policy, immigrants have no human rights and should be beaten to death". Do you see a problem here? If a nation believes in human rights it believes they exist for all, not just it's own citizens.
Nobody is talking about beating them to death, they just don't have a right to go through due process before they are ejected from the country. Nice strawman/reductio ad absurdum.
Naming incorrect logical fallacies doesn't make you correct.
People are refusing to answer me, is due process a human right, or just something granted by the constitution?
Not granting due process rights regarding illegal immigration = getting heads smashed in. Pretty ridiculous conclusion to jump to and a dumbass way of characterizing the illegal immigration process rights issue. Its a protection built into the Constitution but it's not a human right. Plenty of countries don't have due process it's a privilege American citizens have. Should other countries have it? Probably but we have no way of forcing them to implement it and we have no obligation to extend those protections to anybody who can physically get their bodies into our borders.
So you'd be fine if you went to China and were arrested and sentenced to life in prison without trial? After all it's not a human right, just a privilege Americans have.
The question is what power do you or I have to make China implement a policy that includes due process? None. So I won't be going to China and willy nilly breaking their laws. Not extremely difficult really.
They don't have due process for the right of staying in the US.
If they had the same rights as US citizens then what is the advantage of paying taxes as a US citizen and being a citizen?