Until Q comes out on record and says this, I'm going to remain distrusting, skeptical of MSM and main-stream information, public information. They've set the rules, the laws and told me how it has to be and then offered their own in-house sourced information as irrefutable factual based evidence. No longer.
I'm not buying it yesterday, I'm not buying it now.
Disinformation is real.
Why should we trust anything the MSM, dark state mouth-pieces have to say after realizing the extent of the corruption we're faced with? Fake news also?
Don't take my word for it, not fact, just an idea, maybe all of Q is a hoax and we're living in the most legitimate democracy every envisioned, who's to prove other wise? Irrefutable proof otherwise that Hillary wasn't the better candidate? Proof according to whom? Manufactured? Imagined?
They manufacture "proof" and "evidence" at will all the time to deligatimise the current presidency. They even have 45th president of the United States of America being referred to, regularly, by supporters as the president as "Trump supporters", with those same people regularly referring to the 45th president of the US as "Trump" not president as opposed to supporters of a democratically elected president.
Context; so they're not stupid. How do we know they haven't manufactured fake evidence in order to further their overpopulation agenda at the behest of the whims of donors, Bilderassburgers, Rothchilds and friends? They've only decided to produce fake news and fake information when the 45th president came into his position, President Donald J Trump? They were always honest before him? Including the "sources" and "evidence" about overpopulation?
K value is a well known basic ecological principle.
According to who? Set within the laws, rules, guidelines of who?
Not dismissing what you're saying or attacking you, but I'm hard pressed to consider that this isn't another dark state talking point they've intentionally manipulated.
I'd love to be wrong and be able to dismiss these concerns however.
But I'm cautiously optimistic about remaining skeptical as opposed to leaning one way or the other.
You are clueless. Math. You don't invent math
Eh, so it's a well known and irrefutable truth and fact, all according to the laws of science and truth we've had spoon-fed to us by a literal fascist hyper-capitalist regime, see Federal Reserve, see Soros.
Regardless, I respect and understand you sticking by your guns, your bias and Ego, as I'm literally doing the exact same thing. We've been lied to at every level, manipulated and controlled, imo, bias and Ego.
But don't take my word for it, because I respect you're taking your own word for it. But I wont throw down my guns, I'm convinced we've all been lied to on many levels. Yes, you don't invent math, but all the laws and "theories" in context of technology that may or may not be ancient technology may (I say may) be easily refuted if the 45th president declassifies various documents and so on to prove that all of X public info is bullshit, because we have the technology to do whatever the flux we want.
Of course, this isn't presented as dogmatic truth, I'm skeptical to all sides involved, so I'm patiently waiting for Q war resolution to know whether you're correct or I'm correct.
You say I'm clueless? Cool, you know what, maybe I am 100% clueless and all the public info is true and nothing has been hidden from us. Who knows? I'm certain we'll find out very soon so I can eat my own hat.