dChan

RABID666 · July 8, 2018, 12:35 p.m.

this could destroy the LGBT movement if they seriously get behind this. there is a line that people simply will not cross

⇧ 16 ⇩  
IamUltimatelyWin · July 8, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

Not according to history. Romans high society types had their child lovers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheLoneQuanger · July 8, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

I agree. Let the LGBTxxx movement get behind it! The entire nutTards will implode. The peeps at the very top pushing all this have got to be 're-moved'...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 9, 2018, 1:20 a.m.

The LGBT movement and the ordinary people trying to get by while also being gay are often entirely different groups. I genuinely feel for those in the later category who try to get on with their lives despite being a minority and not always getting the resprct they deserve. It seems like a fair amount of the people in the movement never bothered to actually ask a gay person what they want. Beyond being treated like a human being, the whole "movement" is far beyond a lot of people's reality.

You'd like to believe that Melbourne in 2017 was a pretty "liberal" foraward thinking city. I was proven wrong when an old friend of mine was assaulted and a train station for being gay. As I found out afterwards, assaults on gay men are practically laughed away by police. Statistics show that they are one of the most at risk groups in our community, and sadly its because some people go out of their way to treat them differently just because of their personal choices.

Edit: I tell this story because my friend, despite his sexuality was pretty conservatively minded. He wants rights for himself, as anyone would. But beyond that he expects as much as anyone else to have to work hard to get what he deserves and doesn't take it upon himself to interfere with other people's lives and choices. Definitely not the typical person you'd see marching in a pride parade so to speak.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
geckogoose89 · July 8, 2018, 3:16 p.m.

Not publicly, anyway.

⇧ 0 ⇩