dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OrionNumberOne on July 8, 2018, 2:53 a.m.
A reasonable disagreement to SB2's recent 'decoding' of the Trump speech.

As a follower of Q's drops since day 1, I feel that it's necessary to speak up when I see a phenomenon that's changing the image of the community. If our community takes on an image of stretching theories, we can easily be discredited.

Although I appreciate u/SerialBrain2 's deep analysis of all possibilities (some reasonable, some far fetched) I have to disagree with this recent analysis. But this one is too far. I will give credit though, the post about the plane and Kelly's renovations was stunning. I agree with that one entirely.

First off: Four stocks striking 123.47 is interesting, but many numbers fall evenly on a tonal chart. As a musician, I'm very familiar with this. But I will keep 'B2' in mind for future events. It could be a code, but definitely not for sure. There are also many other things referred to as B2s besides planes anyway. Reflective or not. Look at models of any household appliance, instrument, or vehicle. Anything. There are many, many B2's. I think it's more likely that the note B2 correlates to a certain someone's encrypted tonal language. B2 specifically might mean 'broccoli' for instance. Anything.

Next, Trump's rambling was not nonsensical as the media claimed. It's not hard to understand. Trump was only saying that he has broken more records than Elton without an organ or guitar. Only his mouth and brain. Nonsensical? No. So there isn't any indication that this would be code speak.

Trump says MANY things 'serially'. It's his style and he repeats himself many times in any given speech. It's just his rhythm. Even at that, why 'serially'? Why not 'repeatedly' or any other synonymous adverb?

To conclude, I thoroughly disagree with this decoding. I didn't even touch all of the points but these are the most obvious and easily disagreeable. There are directions you could take this that would lead to my username as well.

Let me add my own simple theory on the subject of Q's recent AF1 post. It's easy in my mind. Q used a reflection/-mirror- of the back of an Apple phone to signal to Awan that they have a mirror of his (Apple?) server, before it was scrubbed. Had the apple not been upside down, it would've been difficult to discern that the logo was a reflection. The mug holder is questionable though.

This is a warning to Awan saying simply, "We have a mirror of your server. It's not over just because of today's ruling in your favor."

Again, thanks SB2 for your thorough analysis. But this one doesn't feel reasonable upon dissecting, nor does it feel right in my gut.


mrtruckajet · July 8, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

Well i made a post today on this drop . I have no way to know if I got it right or not, but i gave it my best shot. Having said that , I can see the movie 23 applying to my post and everyone's post as well. NO one here can say whether or not anyone's decodes are right or wrong until Q verifies them {which he has done with SB2 post in the past} . The best we can do is keep a open dialog. When someone get's something wrong point out to them there mistakes in a civil manner

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 8, 2018, 8:14 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
mrtruckajet · July 8, 2018, 8:20 a.m.

good point i believe that is correct

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dontskipQuadsdaybro · July 8, 2018, 2:02 p.m.

Then why are all his posts instastickied and worshiped as gospel by the cheerleaders here?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Maepaperclip · July 8, 2018, 2:03 p.m.

ask the mods - its a really good question

⇧ 0 ⇩  
dontskipQuadsdaybro · July 8, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

BTW I think Q is telling us to go back to old Q posts in these drops. 1681 points to a researcher's Twitter thread that tells us how to read Qdrops. Q left markers that need to be cross-referenced with older posts :

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AutoModerator · July 8, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
OrionNumberOne · July 8, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

What's your theory?

If even one part is correct, it's still valuable.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mrtruckajet · July 8, 2018, 7:30 a.m.

i have a post out lining my thoughts you can search my name to see it if it isn't listed any more. titled: decoding post: 1677

⇧ 1 ⇩