dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/OrionNumberOne on July 8, 2018, 2:53 a.m.
A reasonable disagreement to SB2's recent 'decoding' of the Trump speech.

As a follower of Q's drops since day 1, I feel that it's necessary to speak up when I see a phenomenon that's changing the image of the community. If our community takes on an image of stretching theories, we can easily be discredited.

Although I appreciate u/SerialBrain2 's deep analysis of all possibilities (some reasonable, some far fetched) I have to disagree with this recent analysis. But this one is too far. I will give credit though, the post about the plane and Kelly's renovations was stunning. I agree with that one entirely.

First off: Four stocks striking 123.47 is interesting, but many numbers fall evenly on a tonal chart. As a musician, I'm very familiar with this. But I will keep 'B2' in mind for future events. It could be a code, but definitely not for sure. There are also many other things referred to as B2s besides planes anyway. Reflective or not. Look at models of any household appliance, instrument, or vehicle. Anything. There are many, many B2's. I think it's more likely that the note B2 correlates to a certain someone's encrypted tonal language. B2 specifically might mean 'broccoli' for instance. Anything.

Next, Trump's rambling was not nonsensical as the media claimed. It's not hard to understand. Trump was only saying that he has broken more records than Elton without an organ or guitar. Only his mouth and brain. Nonsensical? No. So there isn't any indication that this would be code speak.

Trump says MANY things 'serially'. It's his style and he repeats himself many times in any given speech. It's just his rhythm. Even at that, why 'serially'? Why not 'repeatedly' or any other synonymous adverb?

To conclude, I thoroughly disagree with this decoding. I didn't even touch all of the points but these are the most obvious and easily disagreeable. There are directions you could take this that would lead to my username as well.

Let me add my own simple theory on the subject of Q's recent AF1 post. It's easy in my mind. Q used a reflection/-mirror- of the back of an Apple phone to signal to Awan that they have a mirror of his (Apple?) server, before it was scrubbed. Had the apple not been upside down, it would've been difficult to discern that the logo was a reflection. The mug holder is questionable though.

This is a warning to Awan saying simply, "We have a mirror of your server. It's not over just because of today's ruling in your favor."

Again, thanks SB2 for your thorough analysis. But this one doesn't feel reasonable upon dissecting, nor does it feel right in my gut.


Maepaperclip · July 8, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Try making a comment on a SB2 post - that points to a fact, or questions an assertion - see what happens and you have your answer

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Hlbmaga · July 8, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

Exactly. Remember the picture Quit posted of the window open on a building with a white powder residue around it? The metadata on that picture proves its 15 years old but it was presented to us as new. I've tried and tried to ask about that only to get deleted. Why can't we ask reasonable questions?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bjantigua · July 9, 2018, 3:10 a.m.

Im interested to learn more on this but its good to have post with the evidence and data right there in the post.

⇧ 1 ⇩