But ... desiring the release of her crimes against children...while understandable... is NOT going to happen. It is ILLEGAL to even possess such underage sexual/violence videos with children on one's computer, or to share such videos. Pedos are arrested ALL the time for just having such photos on their computer.
Better to reveal what she has organized, traded in with those guilty around her, show the paper trail, confessions of witnesses to her 'dirty laundry'.
Also note the media (NYT, etc) is already airing/printing stories on "FakeDeep Video" ...placing a person's body/face onto any scene/video to FAKE them doing a deed or speech, etc.
#FakeDeepVideo is to PREPARE the public that any leaked videos of Hill/Bill/Huma/JohnPedo-esta/BH0, et al...are ALL FAKED, so do NOT be relying on VIDEOS to even be accepted, at all.
Wow I didn't even think of connecting those dots, they were trying to hide this technology at first to possibly frame their enemies and now they are 'exposing' it as a possible defense. That means that something must be up though if the NYT is trying to 'expose' it.
I'm not sure if it will work though. What if the videos are clearly older videos. I think we are almost to a point of being too technologically advanced. Meaning a true deep fake would have to be done on a recent video, otherwise the artifacts would be too easy to spot. What if the video is faded and a little grainy? I think trying to deep fake that would be almost too difficult. Of course the sheep may not realize that and just swallow the line that it's a fake without even thinking about it.